Re: Something wrong with pickaxe?

From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Jan 19, 2006, 09:12 UTC
Message-ID: <43CF5816.1010004@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <7v3bjlt66q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> 
>>... Junio would be open to 
>>more friendly pickaxe semantics if the suggested semantics change was 
>>accompanied by an actual diff to implement them.
> 
> 
> True again.  It is hard to be "more friendly" without actually
> generating a diff ;-).
>

I thought generating diffs was fairly cheap. I agree with Linus somewhat though. I've been puzzled more than once with the pickaxe behaviour when I give it a function name to search for and want to know when the calling semantics changed for that function. I usually also end up doing a whatchanged -p and search it.

It would be neat if the current behaviour could be kept with --pickaxe-exact but all commits containing changes to lines matching the string was returned by default. Or possibly --pickaxe-thourough to do the other way around.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231