From: Andreas Ericsson Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:12:54 GMT Subject: Re: Something wrong with pickaxe? Message-ID: <43CF5816.1010004@op5.se> In-Reply-To: <7v3bjlt66q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Junio C Hamano wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > >>... Junio would be open to >>more friendly pickaxe semantics if the suggested semantics change was >>accompanied by an actual diff to implement them. > > > True again. It is hard to be "more friendly" without actually > generating a diff ;-). > I thought generating diffs was fairly cheap. I agree with Linus somewhat though. I've been puzzled more than once with the pickaxe behaviour when I give it a function name to search for and want to know when the calling semantics changed for that function. I usually also end up doing a whatchanged -p and search it. It would be neat if the current behaviour could be kept with --pickaxe-exact but all commits containing changes to lines matching the string was returned by default. Or possibly --pickaxe-thourough to do the other way around. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231