Re: RFC: Subprojects
- From
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2006, 10:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <43CB7283.3090003@op5.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <200601161328.04985.lan@ac-sw.com>
Alexander Litvinov wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 14:59, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >>Now I'll think aloud about a completely different design. >> >>We could simply overlay the projects. I think this is what >>Johannes suggested earlier. >> >>You keep one branch for each "subproject", and make commits into >>each branch (i.e. if you modified files for the upstream kernel, >>the change is committed to the branch for linux-2.6 subproject), >>but when checking things out, you do an equivalent of octopus >>merge across subprojects. > > If I cleary understand this idea it is NOT that I dreaming about. Almost all > our sub-projects are used in more than one project (imaging network layer > library). So variant with gitlink is that I willing.
Then it isn't so much a subproject as a separate project of its own. Otherwise glibc would be a subproject of pretty much everything and that's hardly a sane setup.
-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231