Re: [PATCH/RFC] "Recursive Make considered harmful"
- From
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 28, 2005, 17:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <42E91151.7060004@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk6jac2cv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote: ...
Show 7 quoted lines
> While I agree gitk should not come as part of git package, this > brings up a different issue. > > Ideally, I'd want to see gitk packaged from its repository > kernel.org:/pub/scm/gitk/git.git/ Paul Mackerras maintains, not > from GIT one which _will_ lag behind. >
...
Show 6 quoted lines
> > While I _do_ rely on gitk in my git work, and I _do_ like its > simplicity (just a single file right now), my longer term > preference is to drop the copy we have in git tree and treat it > just like the other repository browser, qgit. Our documentation > should point people at it as part of the Porcelain suite.
Then this should happen sooner rather than later.