git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: GSoC draft proposal: Line-level history browser

From
Bo Yang <struggleyb.nku@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 22, 2010, 03:52 UTC
Message-ID
<41f08ee11003212052p6b0a7495j2e38f24839541ffb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<4BA61CF9.7040104@gmail.com>
Hi all,
     Thanks a lot for your precious advice and based on that, I have
prepared a new version of my proposal, generally it provide a detailed
options which I want to add to 'git log' and a new syntax for
supporting multi line ranges in any file at any revision. Also, this
version provide a milestones and timeline for this project. Thanks
again for your advice and I appreciate your feedback very much for
this version.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Draft proposal(v2): Line-level History Browser

=====Purpose of this project===== "git blame" can tell us who is responsible for a line of code, but it can't help if we want to get the detail of how the lines of code have evolved as what it is now. This project will add a new feature for 'git log' to display line level history. It can trace the history of any line range of certain file at any revision. For simplity, users can run the command like: ' git log -L builtin/diff.c:6,8 ', he will get the change history of code between line 6 and line 8 of the diff.c file. And for each history entry, it will provide the commits, the diff block which contains changes of users' interested lines. This utility will trace all the modification history of interested lines and stop until it finds the root of the lines, which is a point where all the new code is added from scratch. Also, the users can specify how deeply he wants this utility to trace. And this tool will treat code move just like modification too, so it will follow the code move inside one commit. Note that, the history may not always be a single thread of commits. If there are more than one commit which produce the specified line range, the thread of history will split. And this utility will stop and provide all commits with its code changes to the user, let the user to select which one to trace next.

=====Work and technical issues===== ==Command options== This new feature should be used for exploring the history of changes for certain line range of code in one file.

git log [-m<num>] [-I] [-d depth] [--fuzzy] -L file1@rev1:<start pos>,<end pos> file2@rev2:<start pos>,<end pos>

Options:
1. -m<num>, option to control whether we should follow code movement.
If one -m is given, we follow code movement inside file, when more
than one '-m' is given, we follow the movement between files in one
commit. The <num> is used to specify the lower bound for the number of
lines of moved code. If it is not given, we set it as 1.
2. -I, option to control whether we should display only the 'user
interested lines' diff block [default] or display the whole diff with
the interested area colorfully displayed.
3. -d, option to control the max depth we trace into the commit history.
4. --fuzzy, option to control whether fuzzy code copy mathing is used.
5. '-L' to control whether we run a simple log or we want a line level log.
6. Files and lines. I propose to use such a syntax to specify the
files at revision and line range, <file>@<revision>:<start pos>,<end
pos>. This looks a little complex, but I think it is neccessary
because we will support multiple file at any version and any line
range finally. The revision can be any revision format of Git and the
<pos> can be a number, or a posix regex, just like what 'git blame'
do.
7. And we will support code copy detect, too. The option which control
whether we trace code copy does exist in current 'git log', which is
the option '-C'. Similiarly, one '-C' is used to trace code copy of
new added code inside one commit. Two '-C' will trace any code copy
inside commit tree.

==Design and implementation== Git store all the blobs instead of code delta, so we should traverse the commit history and directly access the tree/blob objects to compute the code delta and search for the diff which contains the interested lines. Since git use libxdiff to format its diff file, we should iterate through all xdiff's diff blocks and find what the code looks like before the commit. This will be done using the callback mechanism. Here, we will find a new line range which is the origin code before this commit. And then start another search from the current commit and the new line range. Recursively, we can find all the modification history. We will stop when we find that the current interested line range is added from scratch and is not moved from other place of the file. Here, if the user want to trace code copy, more work will be done to find the possible code copy. We may also stop the traverse when we reach the max search depth. Also, if the thread of change history split into two or more commits, we stop and provide the users all the related commits and corresponding line range.

Generally,
1. New callback for xdi_diff to parse the diff hunk and store line
level history info.
2. builtin/line-log.c will be added to complete most of the new features.
3. builtin/log.c will be changed to add this new utility to the front end.
4. Documents will be updated to introduce this new tool.

=====Milestones and Timeline===== In this summer, we will add support of line level history browser for only one file. The multiple ranges support is currently not in this project.

The milestones of the project are:
1. Simple modification change history.
2. Code movement inside one file detect.
3. Code movement inside one commit but not a file.
4. Code copy of modified file in one commit.
5. Code copy of any place in one commit tree.
6. Fuzzy matching support.

And the timeline will be: April 26 - May 23: Catch up with Git code base and study the implementation of blame.c and log.c thouroughly.

May 24 - June 21 : Complete a version which supports code modifcation trace but without code movement and code copy support.

June 22 - June 29: Complete a version which supports code movement inside one file.

June 30 - July 7: Complete a version which supports code movement between files inside one commit.

July 8 - July 15: Complete a version which supports code copy of modified file in one commit.

July 16 - July 23: Complete a version which supports code copy of any file in one commit tree.

July 24 - August 7:  Complete fuzzy matching of code movement and copy detect.

=====About me===== I am Bo Yang, a Chinese graduate student majoring in Computer Science of NanKai University. I have touched some open source software since 5 years ago and began to contribute code to open source community from three years ago. I have contributed to Mozilla/Mingw/Netsurf. Technically, I am experienced in C/Bash Shell. I have attended last year's GSoC with Netsurf project. In that project, I have completed most of a DOM library in C. I begin to use git for source code revision from about two years ago. I use Git for track my Mozilla trunk source code. Because updating Mozilla code by CVS in my school is very slow. So, I write one script to automatically updating the trunk with CVS at mid-night, when the network flow is fast, on the server, and then use Git to maintain the code. Then I use Git in my PC to clone/update the source code from my local server and that is very fast. I use Git to track my changes to the code and some bug fixes. It is an excellent tool for branch/history, I think. Git is my lovely daily tool for revision control. I have much experience with it and have read "Git Internals" and also get some basic knowledge about Git's code base. And I think the line-level history explorer is really suitable for me and I can make a good start with this project in Git community.

--------------------------------------------------- Thank you very much!

Regards! Bo

Previous: Johannes SchindelinNext: Jakub Narebski
Message 38 of 54 in “GSoC draft proposal: Line-level history browser”
  1. Bo YangMar 20, 2010
  2. Johannes SchindelinMar 20, 2010
  3. Bo YangMar 20, 2010
  4. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2010
  5. Bo YangMar 21, 2010
  6. Johannes SchindelinMar 20, 2010
  7. Bo YangMar 21, 2010
  8. Alex RiesenMar 20, 2010
  9. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2010
  10. Bo YangMar 21, 2010
  11. A Large Angry SCMMar 20, 2010
  12. Bo YangMar 21, 2010
  13. A Large Angry SCMMar 21, 2010
  14. Bo YangMar 22, 2010
  15. Junio C HamanoMar 22, 2010
  16. Bo YangMar 22, 2010
  17. Junio C HamanoMar 22, 2010
  18. Bo YangMar 22, 2010
  19. Junio C HamanoMar 22, 2010
  20. Bo YangMar 22, 2010
  21. Jonathan NiederMar 22, 2010
  22. Bo YangMar 23, 2010
  23. Jakub NarebskiMar 23, 2010
  24. Bo YangMar 23, 2010
  25. Jakub NarebskiMar 23, 2010
  26. Bo YangMar 23, 2010
  27. Jakub NarebskiMar 23, 2010
  28. Bo YangMar 23, 2010
  29. Jonathan NiederMar 23, 2010
  30. A Large Angry SCMMar 23, 2010
  31. Bo YangMar 24, 2010
  32. Peter KjellerstedtMar 23, 2010
  33. Jonathan NiederMar 23, 2010
  34. Bo YangMar 24, 2010
  35. Jonathan NiederMar 24, 2010
  36. Alex RiesenMar 22, 2010
  37. Johannes SchindelinMar 22, 2010
  38. Bo YangMar 22, 2010
  39. Jakub NarebskiMar 22, 2010
  40. Johannes SchindelinMar 22, 2010
  41. Sverre RabbelierMar 22, 2010
  42. Johannes SchindelinMar 22, 2010
  43. Sverre RabbelierMar 22, 2010
  44. Johannes SchindelinMar 22, 2010
  45. Bo YangMar 23, 2010
  46. Bo YangMar 23, 2010
  47. Bo YangMar 29, 2010
  48. Thomas RastMar 29, 2010
  49. Bo YangMar 30, 2010
  50. Michael J GruberMar 30, 2010
  51. Michael J GruberMar 30, 2010
  52. Bo YangMar 30, 2010
  53. Jakub NarebskiMar 30, 2010
  54. Bo YangMar 30, 2010

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.