Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] trailer: append trailers in-process and drop the fork to `interpret-trailers`
- From
- phillip.wood123@gmail.com <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 11, 2025, 09:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <407631ab-1184-41b1-8043-fd91d860e845@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8qlzkukw.fsf@gitster.g>
On 11/06/2025 01:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Li Chen <me@linux.beauty> writes: > >> * `amend_strbuf_with_trailers()` >> – parses the existing message, >> – merges trailers from the command line and config, >> – formats the final trailer block, and >> – rewrites the supplied `struct strbuf` >> without ever leaving the current process. > > If such a helper function exists, shouldn't "interpret-trailers" be > able to lose quite a lot of lines, at least nearly as many as the > new lines introduced to this new function, by making it call this > function as well? And that would ensure that the internal call can > safely replace the external call and produce exactly the same > output? If so, that can be a pure refactoring patch that can become > a commit on its own, I presume?
Exactly - I was expecting to see a refactoring of interpret_trailers() in builtin/interpret-trailers.c that moved most of the function body into a new function in trailer.c that added the trailers to an strbuf. This seems to be a parallel implementation which doesn't sound like the best plan.
I'm going to be off the list for a couple of weeks, I'll take a more detailed look at this series when I'm back
Best Wishes
Phillip
Show 50 quoted lines
>
>> * `amend_file_with_trailers()` becomes a thin wrapper that reads a file
>> into a `strbuf`, calls the new helper, and writes the result back.
>> * `builtin/rebase.c` now calls `amend_file_with_trailers()` instead of
>> executing `interpret-trailers`.
>
> And then these two changes can become a separate patch on top?
>
>> -int amend_file_with_trailers(const char *path, const struct strvec *trailer_args)
>
> This lone "removed line" can be avoided if the patch did not touch
> this line ...
>
>> +static size_t first_comment_pos(const struct strbuf *buf)
>> {
>> - struct child_process run_trailer = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>> -
>> - run_trailer.git_cmd = 1;
>> - strvec_pushl(&run_trailer.args, "interpret-trailers",
>> - "--in-place", "--no-divider",
>> - path, NULL);
>> - strvec_pushv(&run_trailer.args, trailer_args->v);
>> - return run_command(&run_trailer);
>> + const char *p = buf->buf;
>> + const char *end = buf->buf + buf->len;
>> +
>> + while (p < end) {
>> + const char *line = p;
>> + const char *nl = memchr(p, '\n', end - p);
>> + size_t len = nl ? (size_t)(nl - p) : (size_t)(end - p);
>> +
>> + /* skip leading whitespace */
>> + size_t i = 0;
>> + while (i < len && isspace((unsigned char)line[i]))
>> + i++;
>> +
>> + if (i < len && line[i] == '#')
>> + return (size_t)(line - buf->buf); /* comment starts here */
>> +
>> + if (!nl) /* last line without newline */
>> + break;
>> + p = nl + 1;
>> + }
>> + return buf->len; /* no comment line found */
>> +}
>> +
>> +int amend_strbuf_with_trailers(struct strbuf *buf,
>> + const struct strvec *trailer_args)
>
> ... like this?