Re: [PATCH 3/4] git-commit-graph.txt: refer to "*commit* graph file"
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 19, 2018, 23:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <38803edb-de41-90db-33f6-f1a0d5344608@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <65f42c947aa2b392075740673a5dc889fd6e64e6.1537374062.git.martin.agren@gmail.com>
On 9/19/2018 12:30 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> This document sometimes refers to the "commit graph file" as just "the > graph file". This saves a couple of words here and there at the risk of > confusion. In particular, the documentation for `git commit-graph read` > appears to suggest that there are indeed different types of graph files. > > Let's just write out the full name everywhere.
This is a good idea. Let's be specific.
> The full name, by the way, is not the "commit-graph file" with a dash, > cf. the synopsis. Use the dashless form. (The next commit will fix the > remaining few instances of the "commit-graph file" in this document.)
The file is literally at ".git/objects/info/commit-graph" which is why I tried to use "commit-graph" everywhere. Why do you think that "commit graph" is better?
Thanks, -Stolee