From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:32:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] git-commit-graph.txt: refer to "*commit* graph file"
Message-ID: <38803edb-de41-90db-33f6-f1a0d5344608@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <65f42c947aa2b392075740673a5dc889fd6e64e6.1537374062.git.martin.agren@gmail.com>

On 9/19/2018 12:30 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
> This document sometimes refers to the "commit graph file" as just "the
> graph file". This saves a couple of words here and there at the risk of
> confusion. In particular, the documentation for `git commit-graph read`
> appears to suggest that there are indeed different types of graph files.
>
> Let's just write out the full name everywhere.
This is a good idea. Let's be specific.
> The full name, by the way, is not the "commit-graph file" with a dash,
> cf. the synopsis. Use the dashless form. (The next commit will fix the
> remaining few instances of the "commit-graph file" in this document.)

The file is literally at ".git/objects/info/commit-graph" which is why I 
tried to use "commit-graph" everywhere. Why do you think that "commit 
graph" is better?

Thanks,
-Stolee