Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] merge-index: libify merge_one_path() and merge_all()
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 5, 2021, 15:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2ff7cebf-0084-aef8-bf82-d76a82be23e7@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20201124115315.13311-6-alban.gruin@gmail.com>
On 11/24/2020 6:53 AM, Alban Gruin wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> The "resolve" and "octopus" merge strategies do not call directly `git > merge-one-file', they delegate the work to another git command, `git > merge-index', that will loop over files in the index and call the > specified command. Unfortunately, these functions are not part of > libgit.a, which means that once rewritten, the strategies would still > have to invoke `merge-one-file' by spawning a new process first.
This is a good thing to do.
Show 5 quoted lines
> To avoid this, this moves and renames merge_one_path(), merge_all(), and > their helpers to merge-strategies.c. They also take a callback to > dictate what they should do for each file. For now, to preserve the > behaviour of `merge-index', only one callback, launching a new process, > is defined.
I don't think the callback should be in libgit.a, though. The callback itself should be a static method inside builtin/merge-index.c.
Show 96 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
> ---
> builtin/merge-index.c | 77 +++----------------------------
> merge-strategies.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> merge-strategies.h | 19 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/merge-index.c b/builtin/merge-index.c
> index 38ea6ad6ca..d5e5713b25 100644
> --- a/builtin/merge-index.c
> +++ b/builtin/merge-index.c
> @@ -1,74 +1,11 @@
> #define USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS
> #include "builtin.h"
> -#include "run-command.h"
> -
> -static const char *pgm;
> -static int one_shot, quiet;
> -static int err;
> -
> -static int merge_entry(int pos, const char *path)
> -{
> - int found;
> - const char *arguments[] = { pgm, "", "", "", path, "", "", "", NULL };
> - char hexbuf[4][GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
> - char ownbuf[4][60];
> -
> - if (pos >= active_nr)
> - die("git merge-index: %s not in the cache", path);
> - found = 0;
> - do {
> - const struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[pos];
> - int stage = ce_stage(ce);
> -
> - if (strcmp(ce->name, path))
> - break;
> - found++;
> - oid_to_hex_r(hexbuf[stage], &ce->oid);
> - xsnprintf(ownbuf[stage], sizeof(ownbuf[stage]), "%o", ce->ce_mode);
> - arguments[stage] = hexbuf[stage];
> - arguments[stage + 4] = ownbuf[stage];
> - } while (++pos < active_nr);
> - if (!found)
> - die("git merge-index: %s not in the cache", path);
> -
> - if (run_command_v_opt(arguments, 0)) {
> - if (one_shot)
> - err++;
> - else {
> - if (!quiet)
> - die("merge program failed");
> - exit(1);
> - }
> - }
> - return found;
> -}
> -
> -static void merge_one_path(const char *path)
> -{
> - int pos = cache_name_pos(path, strlen(path));
> -
> - /*
> - * If it already exists in the cache as stage0, it's
> - * already merged and there is nothing to do.
> - */
> - if (pos < 0)
> - merge_entry(-pos-1, path);
> -}
> -
> -static void merge_all(void)
> -{
> - int i;
> - for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
> - const struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
> - if (!ce_stage(ce))
> - continue;
> - i += merge_entry(i, ce->name)-1;
> - }
> -}
> +#include "merge-strategies.h"
>
> int cmd_merge_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> {
> - int i, force_file = 0;
> + int i, force_file = 0, err = 0, one_shot = 0, quiet = 0;
> + const char *pgm;
>
> /* Without this we cannot rely on waitpid() to tell
> * what happened to our children.
> @@ -98,14 +35,14 @@ int cmd_merge_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> continue;
> }
> if (!strcmp(arg, "-a")) {
> - merge_all();
> + err |= merge_all_index(the_repository, one_shot, quiet,
> + merge_one_file_spawn, (void *)pgm);This hunk makes it look like pgm is uninitialized, but it is set earlier in cmd_merge_index() (previously referring to the global instance). Good.
Show 29 quoted lines
> +int merge_one_file_spawn(struct repository *r,
> + const struct object_id *orig_blob,
> + const struct object_id *our_blob,
> + const struct object_id *their_blob, const char *path,
> + unsigned int orig_mode, unsigned int our_mode, unsigned int their_mode,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + char oids[3][GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1] = {{0}};
> + char modes[3][10] = {{0}};
> + const char *arguments[] = { (char *)data, oids[0], oids[1], oids[2],
> + path, modes[0], modes[1], modes[2], NULL };
> +
> + if (orig_blob) {
> + oid_to_hex_r(oids[0], orig_blob);
> + xsnprintf(modes[0], sizeof(modes[0]), "%06o", orig_mode);
> + }
> +
> + if (our_blob) {
> + oid_to_hex_r(oids[1], our_blob);
> + xsnprintf(modes[1], sizeof(modes[1]), "%06o", our_mode);
> + }
> +
> + if (their_blob) {
> + oid_to_hex_r(oids[2], their_blob);
> + xsnprintf(modes[2], sizeof(modes[2]), "%06o", their_mode);
> + }
> +
> + return run_command_v_opt(arguments, 0);
> +}Yes, this would be better in the builtin code. Better to keep the meaning of 'data' clear in the context of that file.
Show 72 quoted lines
> +static int merge_entry(struct repository *r, int quiet, unsigned int pos,
> + const char *path, int *err, merge_fn fn, void *data)
> +{
> + int found = 0;
> + const struct object_id *oids[3] = {NULL};
> + unsigned int modes[3] = {0};
> +
> + do {
> + const struct cache_entry *ce = r->index->cache[pos];
> + int stage = ce_stage(ce);
> +
> + if (strcmp(ce->name, path))
> + break;
> + found++;
> + oids[stage - 1] = &ce->oid;
> + modes[stage - 1] = ce->ce_mode;
> + } while (++pos < r->index->cache_nr);
> + if (!found)
> + return error(_("%s is not in the cache"), path);
> +
> + if (fn(r, oids[0], oids[1], oids[2], path,
> + modes[0], modes[1], modes[2], data)) {
> + if (!quiet)
> + error(_("Merge program failed"));
> + (*err)++;
> + }
> +
> + return found;
> +}
> +
> +int merge_index_path(struct repository *r, int oneshot, int quiet,
> + const char *path, merge_fn fn, void *data)
> +{
> + int pos = index_name_pos(r->index, path, strlen(path)), ret, err = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If it already exists in the cache as stage0, it's
> + * already merged and there is nothing to do.
> + */
> + if (pos < 0) {
> + ret = merge_entry(r, quiet || oneshot, -pos - 1, path, &err, fn, data);
> + if (ret == -1)
> + return -1;
> + else if (err)
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int merge_all_index(struct repository *r, int oneshot, int quiet,
> + merge_fn fn, void *data)
> +{
> + int err = 0, ret;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < r->index->cache_nr; i++) {
> + const struct cache_entry *ce = r->index->cache[i];
> + if (!ce_stage(ce))
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = merge_entry(r, quiet || oneshot, i, ce->name, &err, fn, data);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + i += ret - 1;
> + else if (ret == -1)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (err && !oneshot)
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}I notice that these methods don't actually use the repository pointer more than they just use 'r->index'. Should they instead take a 'struct index_state *istate' directly? (I see that the repository is used later by merge_strategies_resolve(), but not in these.)
If you think it likely that we will need a repository for these methods, then feel free to ignore me and keep your 'r' pointer.
Thanks, -Stolee