Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] clone: test for our behavior on odd objects/* content
- From
Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2019, 03:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2e2b8ac6-86e8-1820-89fa-2b04a9ce8151@usp.br>
- In-Reply-To
- <87o96uvh4x.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
Hi, Ævar
First of all, I must apologize for my very late reply. I just got back from a trip and only now have been able to look again at this series.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 10:49 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 28 2019, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: > > > Hi, Ævar > > > > I'm finishing the required changes in this series to send a v4, but > > when submitting to travis ci, I got some errors on the > > t5604-clone-reference test: > > https://travis-ci.org/MatheusBernardino/git/builds/500007587 > > I don't have access to an OSX box, but could reproduce the failure on > NetBSD. > > It's because there link() when faced with a symlink behaves > differently. On GNU/Linux link()-ing a symlink will produce another > symlink like it, on NetBSD (and presumably OSX) doing that will produce > a hardlink to the file the existing symlink points to.
Hm, interesting. I installed NetBSD here and played with it a little: It seems that the inconsistency comes from the fact that link() follows symlinks on NetBSD but not on Linux. i.e., if you have a file "C" link()-ed to a file "B" which, in turn, is a symlink to a file "A", running "ls -li A B C" we can see that: - On linux, C points to B's inode - On NetBSD, C points to A's inode
> I've pushed out a version of mine here which you might want to pull in: > https://github.com/git/git/compare/master...avar:clone-dir-iterator-3 > > I.e. this whole thing is silly, but just preserving the notion that > we're not going to introduce behavior changes as we're refactoring. > > So it adds a commit right after the tests I added to detect this case, > and use symlink() or link() as appropriate instead of link().
I think this still modifies [a little] the current behaviour, since symlink() will make dest->buf point to a new inode (which will be a symlink just as src->buf, but on a different inode) while the current behaviour, on Linux, is to have dest->buf being a hardlink to src->buf (same inode). I don't know if this sentence got too confuse, but what I meant is that symlink() will make a symlink at dest->buf while link(), on linux, will make a hardlink to the given symlink.
> There's then a commit at the end you might want to squash in that > reproduces this behavior on top of your iterator refactoring. > > Of course the DIR_ITERATOR_FOLLOW_SYMLINKS flag at this point is rather > silly. We're telling it to stat(), and then end up needing both stat() > and lstat() data. > > I'm starting to think that this interface which previously only had one > caller, but now has two exists at the wrong abstraction level. I.e. it > itself needs to call lstat(). Seems sensible to always do that and leave > it to the caller to call stat() if they need, as I believe Duy pointed > out.
I see what you mean, but if the caller needs to call stat() itself, in the occurrence of a symlink to a directory, it would have to start a new directory iteration upon the symlinked dir and its subdirectories (if it wants to follow symlinks). This approach could became a little messy, IMHO. And just by calling stat() at dir-iterator we already get the symlinked directories iterated "for free", without having to modify anything else in the code. So I still think it is a good idea to have the DIR_ITERATOR_FOLLOW_SYMLINKS flag at dir-iterator, making it call stat() instead of lstat().
> Also noticed that dir-iterator.h still has a comment to the effect > that it'll call "lstat()", even though we now have a "stat() or > lstat()?" flag.
Thanks for noticing it, I will fix it in v4.
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:28 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> > <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add tests for what happens when we locally clone .git/objects
> >> directories where some of the loose objects or packs are symlinked, or
> >> when when there's unknown files there.
> >>
> >> I'm bending over backwards here to avoid a SHA1 dependency. See [1]
> >> for an earlier and simpler version that hardcoded a SHA-1s.
> >>
> >> This behavior has been the same for a *long* time, but hasn't been
> >> tested for.
> >>
> >> There's a good post-hoc argument to be made for copying over unknown
> >> things, e.g. I'd like a git version that doesn't know about the
> >> commit-graph to copy it under "clone --local" so a newer git version
> >> can make use of it.
> >>
> >> But the behavior showed where with symlinks seems pretty
> >> random. E.g. if "pack" is a symlink we end up with two copies of the
> >> contents, and only transfer some symlinks as-is.
> >>
> >> In follow-up commits we'll look at changing some of this behavior, but
> >> for now let's just assert it as-is so we'll notice what we'll change
> >> later.
> >>
> >> 1.
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190226002625.13022-5-avarab@gmail.com/
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> t/t5604-clone-reference.sh | 142
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 142 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/t/t5604-clone-reference.sh b/t/t5604-clone-reference.sh
> >> index 4320082b1b..cb0dc22d14 100755
> >> --- a/t/t5604-clone-reference.sh
> >> +++ b/t/t5604-clone-reference.sh
> >> @@ -221,4 +221,146 @@ test_expect_success 'clone, dissociate from
alternates' '
> >> ( cd C && git fsck )
> >> '
> >>
> >> +test_expect_success 'setup repo with garbage in objects/*' '
> >> + git init S &&
> >> + (
> >> + cd S &&
> >> + test_commit A &&
> >> +
> >> + cd .git/objects &&
> >> + >.some-hidden-file &&
> >> + >some-file &&
> >> + mkdir .some-hidden-dir &&
> >> + >.some-hidden-dir/some-file &&
> >> + >.some-hidden-dir/.some-dot-file &&
> >> + mkdir some-dir &&
> >> + >some-dir/some-file &&
> >> + >some-dir/.some-dot-file
> >> + )
> >> +'
> >> +
> >> +test_expect_success 'clone a repo with garbage in objects/*' '
> >> + for option in --local --no-hardlinks --shared --dissociate
> >> + do
> >> + git clone $option S S$option || return 1 &&
> >> + git -C S$option fsck || return 1
> >> + done &&
> >> + find S-* -name "*some*" | sort >actual &&
> >> + cat >expected <<-EOF &&
> >> + S--dissociate/.git/objects/.some-hidden-file
> >> + S--dissociate/.git/objects/some-dir
> >> + S--dissociate/.git/objects/some-dir/.some-dot-file
> >> + S--dissociate/.git/objects/some-dir/some-file
> >> + S--dissociate/.git/objects/some-file
> >> + S--local/.git/objects/.some-hidden-file
> >> + S--local/.git/objects/some-dir
> >> + S--local/.git/objects/some-dir/.some-dot-file
> >> + S--local/.git/objects/some-dir/some-file
> >> + S--local/.git/objects/some-file
> >> + S--no-hardlinks/.git/objects/.some-hidden-file
> >> + S--no-hardlinks/.git/objects/some-dir
> >> + S--no-hardlinks/.git/objects/some-dir/.some-dot-file
> >> + S--no-hardlinks/.git/objects/some-dir/some-file
> >> + S--no-hardlinks/.git/objects/some-file
> >> + EOF
> >> + test_cmp expected actual
> >> +'
> >> +
> >> +test_expect_success SYMLINKS 'setup repo with manually symlinked
objects/*' '
> >> + git init T &&
> >> + (
> >> + cd T &&
> >> + test_commit A &&
> >> + git gc &&
> >> + (
> >> + cd .git/objects &&
> >> + mv pack packs &&
> >> + ln -s packs pack
> >> + ) &&
> >> + test_commit B &&
> >> + (
> >> + cd .git/objects &&
> >> + find ?? -type d >loose-dirs &&
> >> + last_loose=$(tail -n 1 loose-dirs) &&
> >> + mv $last_loose a-loose-dir &&
> >> + ln -s a-loose-dir $last_loose &&
> >> + first_loose=$(head -n 1 loose-dirs) &&
> >> + (
> >> + cd $first_loose &&
> >> + obj=$(ls *) &&
> >> + mv $obj ../an-object &&
> >> + ln -s ../an-object $obj
> >> + ) &&
> >> + find . -type f | sort
>../../../T.objects-files.raw &&
> >> + find . -type l | sort
>../../../T.objects-links.raw
> >> + )
> >> + ) &&
> >> + git -C T fsck &&
> >> + git -C T rev-list --all --objects >T.objects
> >> +'
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +test_expect_success SYMLINKS 'clone repo with symlinked objects/*' '
> >> + for option in --local --no-hardlinks --shared --dissociate
> >> + do
> >> + git clone $option T T$option || return 1 &&
> >> + git -C T$option fsck || return 1 &&
> >> + git -C T$option rev-list --all --objects
>T$option.objects &&
> >> + test_cmp T.objects T$option.objects &&
> >> + (
> >> + cd T$option/.git/objects &&
> >> + find . -type f | sort
>../../../T$option.objects-files.raw &&
> >> + find . -type l | sort
>../../../T$option.objects-links.raw
> >> + )
> >> + done &&
> >> +
> >> + for raw in $(ls T*.raw)
> >> + do
> >> + sed -e "s!/..\$!/X!; s!/../!/Y/!;
s![0-9a-f]\{38,\}!Z!" <$raw >$raw.de-sha || return 1
> >> + done &&
> >> +
> >> + cat >expected-files <<-EOF &&
> >> + ./Y/Z
> >> + ./a-loose-dir/Z
> >> + ./an-object
> >> + ./Y/Z
> >> + ./info/packs
> >> + ./loose-dirs
> >> + ./pack/pack-Z.idx
> >> + ./pack/pack-Z.pack
> >> + ./packs/pack-Z.idx
> >> + ./packs/pack-Z.pack
> >> + EOF
> >> + cat >expected-links <<-EOF &&
> >> + ./Y/Z
> >> + EOF
> >> + for option in --local --dissociate
> >> + do
> >> + test_cmp expected-files
T$option.objects-files.raw.de-sha || return 1 &&
> >> + test_cmp expected-links
T$option.objects-links.raw.de-sha || return 1
> >> + done &&
> >> +
> >> + cat >expected-files <<-EOF &&
> >> + ./Y/Z
> >> + ./Y/Z
> >> + ./a-loose-dir/Z
> >> + ./an-object
> >> + ./Y/Z
> >> + ./info/packs
> >> + ./loose-dirs
> >> + ./pack/pack-Z.idx
> >> + ./pack/pack-Z.pack
> >> + ./packs/pack-Z.idx
> >> + ./packs/pack-Z.pack
> >> + EOF
> >> + test_cmp expected-files
T--no-hardlinks.objects-files.raw.de-sha &&
> >> + test_must_be_empty T--no-hardlinks.objects-links.raw.de-sha &&
> >> +
> >> + cat >expected-files <<-EOF &&
> >> + ./info/alternates
> >> + EOF
> >> + test_cmp expected-files T--shared.objects-files.raw &&
> >> + test_must_be_empty T--shared.objects-links.raw
> >> +'
> >> +
> >> test_done
> >> --
> >> 2.21.0.rc2.261.ga7da99ff1b
> >>