Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?
- From
Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
- Date
- Nov 26, 2007, 17:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2A34D324-48A4-49EF-9D4E-5B9469A0791D@lrde.epita.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <fiet88$68n$1@ger.gmane.org>
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Andy Parkins wrote:
> - libgit would have come first
I warmly second that.
> - "git revert" should be called "git invert" > - "git revert" would (maybe) be "git reset"
But here, I have to disagree. Why would you want to call "git- revert" "git-reset"?
I know it's annoying that commands with the same name do different things in SVN/CVS but I don't think it's a reason to necessarily adapt to them. There are plenty of misnomers already anyway (checkout, commit, add).
While we're discussing bad names, as someone already pointed out, I agree it's sad that "git push" is almost always understood as being the opposite of "git pull".
-- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory