Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] merge-ort: avoid accidental API mis-use
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 17, 2021, 14:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <27adacaa-741b-b738-bba9-4d9131aace21@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <becd451030183e6271646a4bf006c2466822326e.1620094339.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On 5/3/21 10:12 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > Previously, callers of the merge-ort API could have passed an > uninitialized value for struct merge_result *result. However, we want > to check result to see if it has cached renames from a previous merge > that we can reuse; such values would be found behind result->priv. > However, if result->priv is uninitialized, attempting to access behind > it will give a segfault. So, we need result->priv to be NULL (which > will be the case if the caller does a memset(&result, 0)), or be written > by a previous call to the merge-ort machinery. Documenting this > requirement may help, but despite being the person who introduced this > requirement, I still missed it once and it did not fail in a very clear > way and led to a long debugging session.
I empathize with your frustration here.
Show 6 quoted lines
> Add a _properly_initialized field to merge_result; that value will be > 0 if the caller zero'ed the merge_result, it will be set to a very > specific value by a previous run by the merge-ort machinery, and if it's > uninitialized it will most likely either be 0 or some value that does > not match the specific one we'd expect allowing us to throw a much more > meaningful error.
This approach is an interesting pattern to follow for future efforts, too.
Show 35 quoted lines
> +static unsigned RESULT_INITIALIZED = 0x1abe11ed; /* unlikely accidental value */
> +
> struct traversal_callback_data {
> unsigned long mask;
> unsigned long dirmask;
> @@ -3746,6 +3748,10 @@ static void merge_start(struct merge_options *opt, struct merge_result *result)
> assert(opt->obuf.len == 0);
>
> assert(opt->priv == NULL);
> + if (result->_properly_initialized != 0 &&
> + result->_properly_initialized != RESULT_INITIALIZED)
> + BUG("struct merge_result passed to merge_incore_*recursive() must be zeroed or filled with values from a previous run");
> + assert(!!result->priv == !!result->_properly_initialized);
> if (result->priv) {
> opt->priv = result->priv;
> result->priv = NULL;
> @@ -3905,6 +3911,7 @@ static void merge_ort_nonrecursive_internal(struct merge_options *opt,
> result->clean &= strmap_empty(&opt->priv->conflicted);
> if (!opt->priv->call_depth) {
> result->priv = opt->priv;
> + result->_properly_initialized = RESULT_INITIALIZED;
> opt->priv = NULL;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/merge-ort.h b/merge-ort.h
> index d53a0a339f33..c011864ffeb1 100644
> --- a/merge-ort.h
> +++ b/merge-ort.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct merge_result {
> * !clean) and to print "CONFLICT" messages. Not for external use.
> */
> void *priv;
> + /* Also private */
> + unsigned _properly_initialized;
> };Will work as intended. Thank you for reducing developer friction.
Thanks, -Stolee