Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] doc: add documentation for OPT_STRING_LIST

> Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes:
>
>> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
>>
>> Commit c8ba16391655 ("parse-options: add OPT_STRING_LIST helper",
>> 2011-06-09) added the OPT_STRING_LIST as a way to accumulate a repeated
>> list of strings. However, this was not documented in the
>> api-parse-options documentation. Add documentation now so that future
>> developers may learn of its existence.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt 
>> b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt
>> index 27bd701c0d68..6914f54f5f44 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt
>> @@ -168,6 +168,11 @@ There are some macros to easily define options:
>>  Introduce an option with string argument.
>>  The string argument is put into `str_var`.
>>
>> +`OPT_STRING_LIST(short, long, &list, arg_str, description)`::
>> + Introduce an option with string argument.
>> + The string argument is stored as an element in `&list` which must be a
>> + struct string_list. Reset the list using `--no-option`.
>> +
>
> I do not know if it is clear enough that 'option' in the last
> sentence is a placeholder.  I then wondered if spelling it as
> `--no-<long>` would make it a bit clearer, but that is ugly.

>
> The "Reset the list" is an instruction to the end-users who interact
> with a program written by readers of this document using
> OPT_STRING_LIST(), and it feels a bit out of place.  Perhaps
>
> End users can reset the list by negating the option,
> i.e. passing "--no-<long>", on the command line.
>
> I dunno.
>
> Anyway, thanks for adding a missing doc here.
>
>>  `OPT_INTEGER(short, long, &int_var, description)`::
>>  Introduce an option with integer argument.
>>  The integer is put into `int_var`.
>