Re: [PATCH 04/20] t0040-parse-options: test parse_options() with various 'parse_opt_flags'
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 25, 2022, 14:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <220725.86edy9p85i.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20220725123857.2773963-5-szeder.dev@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 25 2022, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
Show 96 quoted lines
> In 't0040-parse-options.sh' we thoroughly test the parsing of all
> types and forms of options, but in all those tests parse_options() is
> always invoked with a 0 flags parameter.
>
> Add a few tests to demonstrate how various 'enum parse_opt_flags'
> values are supposed to influence option parsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/helper/test-parse-options.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> t/helper/test-tool.c | 1 +
> t/helper/test-tool.h | 1 +
> t/t0040-parse-options.sh | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/helper/test-parse-options.c b/t/helper/test-parse-options.c
> index 48d3cf6692..32b906bd6a 100644
> --- a/t/helper/test-parse-options.c
> +++ b/t/helper/test-parse-options.c
> @@ -192,3 +192,64 @@ int cmd__parse_options(int argc, const char **argv)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +static int parse_options_flags__cmd(int argc, const char **argv,
> + enum parse_opt_flags test_flags)
> +{
> + const char *usage[] = {
> + "<...> cmd [options]",
> + NULL
> + };
> + int opt = 0;
> + const struct option options[] = {
> + OPT_INTEGER('o', "opt", &opt, "an integer option"),
> + OPT_END()
> + };
> +
> + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, NULL, options, usage, test_flags);
> +
> + printf("opt: %d\n", opt);
> + for (int i = 0; i < argc; i++)
> + printf("arg %02d: %s\n", i, argv[i]);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static enum parse_opt_flags test_flags = 0;
> +static const struct option test_flag_options[] = {
> + OPT_GROUP("flag-options:"),
> + OPT_BIT(0, "keep-dashdash", &test_flags,
> + "pass PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH to parse_options()",
> + PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH),
> + OPT_BIT(0, "stop-at-non-option", &test_flags,
> + "pass PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION to parse_options()",
> + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION),
> + OPT_BIT(0, "keep-argv0", &test_flags,
> + "pass PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 to parse_options()",
> + PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0),
> + OPT_BIT(0, "keep-unknown", &test_flags,
> + "pass PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN to parse_options()",
> + PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN),
> + OPT_BIT(0, "no-internal-help", &test_flags,
> + "pass PARSE_OPT_NO_INTERNAL_HELP to parse_options()",
> + PARSE_OPT_NO_INTERNAL_HELP),
> + OPT_END()
> +};
> +
> +int cmd__parse_options_flags(int argc, const char **argv)
> +{
> + const char *usage[] = {
> + "test-tool parse-options-flags [flag-options] cmd [options]",
> + NULL
> + };
> +
> + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, NULL, test_flag_options, usage,
> + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> +
> + if (argc == 0 || strcmp(argv[0], "cmd")) {
> + error("'cmd' is mandatory");
> + usage_with_options(usage, test_flag_options);
> + }
> +
> + return parse_options_flags__cmd(argc, argv, test_flags);
> +}
> diff --git a/t/helper/test-tool.c b/t/helper/test-tool.c
> index 318fdbab0c..6e62282b60 100644
> --- a/t/helper/test-tool.c
> +++ b/t/helper/test-tool.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static struct test_cmd cmds[] = {
> { "online-cpus", cmd__online_cpus },
> { "pack-mtimes", cmd__pack_mtimes },
> { "parse-options", cmd__parse_options },
> + { "parse-options-flags", cmd__parse_options_flags },
> { "parse-pathspec-file", cmd__parse_pathspec_file },
> { "partial-clone", cmd__partial_clone },
> { "path-utils", cmd__path_utils },I wanted to add some new parse_options() code to t/helper/test-parse-options.c in the past, but was stymied by its cmd_*() going through a singular parse_options().
So just creating a new callback is a neat solution.
But wouldn't it be better to just create a new t/helper/test-parse-options-something-.c & test file? It seems this doesn't really share anything with the current helper & tests...