Re: [PATCH 6/7] xdiff: remove xdl_malloc() wrapper, use malloc(), not xmalloc()
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 8, 2022, 21:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <220708.868rp39t28.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1bf5d574-4202-31e3-4dc3-d7890465d28f@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 08 2022, Phillip Wood wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On 08/07/2022 15:20, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> As noted in 36c83197249 (xdiff: use xmalloc/xrealloc, 2019-04-11) the >> reason we have xdl_malloc() in the first place was to make the xdiff >> code safer, it was not handling some allocation failures correctly at >> the time. > > This is untrue, we do not have xdl_malloc to make the xdiff code > safer, that macro was introduced with the initial import of > xdiff. 36c83197249 just changed its definition, the entire commit > consists of > > -#define xdl_malloc(x) malloc(x) > +#define xdl_malloc(x) xmalloc(x) > #define xdl_free(ptr) free(ptr) > -#define xdl_realloc(ptr,x) realloc(ptr,x) > +#define xdl_realloc(ptr,x) xrealloc(ptr,x)
Yes sorry about that, I'm missing a few words there, and meant "the reason we have this incarnation of xdl_malloc()[...]", or something to that effect.
> I can see the argument for reverting that change now that we have > fixed the error checking but that is not a good reason to remove > xdl_malloc().
Indeed, but hopefully https://lore.kernel.org/git/220708.86czef9t6y.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/ is that argument.
Show 101 quoted lines
>> But as noted in that commit doing this was intended as a stopgap, as
>> various code in xdiff/* did not correctly handle allocation failures,
>> and would have segfaulted if malloc() returned NULL.
>> But since then and after preceding commits we can be confident that
>> malloc() failures are handled correctly. All of these users of
>> xdl_malloc() are checking their return values, and we're returning
>> -1 (or similar ) to the top-level in case of failures.
>> This also has the big advantage of making the compiler and analysis
>> tools less confused, and potentially avoiding undefined (compiler)
>> behavior. I.e. we define our own xmalloc() to call die() on failure,
>> and that function uses the non-standard "noreturn" attribute on our
>> most common compiler targets.
>> But xdl_malloc()'s use conflicted with that, confusing both human
>> readers of this code, and potentially compilers as well.
>> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> xdiff/xdiff.h | 1 -
>> xdiff/xdiffi.c | 2 +-
>> xdiff/xmerge.c | 10 +++++-----
>> xdiff/xutils.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/xdiff/xdiff.h b/xdiff/xdiff.h
>> index 832cf9d977e..df048e0099b 100644
>> --- a/xdiff/xdiff.h
>> +++ b/xdiff/xdiff.h
>> @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ typedef struct s_bdiffparam {
>> } bdiffparam_t;
>>
>> -#define xdl_malloc(x) xmalloc(x)
>> #define xdl_free(ptr) free(ptr)
>> void *xdl_mmfile_first(mmfile_t *mmf, long *size);
>> diff --git a/xdiff/xdiffi.c b/xdiff/xdiffi.c
>> index 077cc456087..6590811634f 100644
>> --- a/xdiff/xdiffi.c
>> +++ b/xdiff/xdiffi.c
>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int xdl_do_diff(mmfile_t *mf1, mmfile_t *mf2, xpparam_t const *xpp,
>> static xdchange_t *xdl_add_change(xdchange_t *xscr, long i1, long i2, long chg1, long chg2) {
>> xdchange_t *xch;
>> - if (!(xch = (xdchange_t *) xdl_malloc(sizeof(xdchange_t))))
>> + if (!(xch = (xdchange_t *) malloc(sizeof(xdchange_t))))
>> return NULL;
>> xch->next = xscr;
>> diff --git a/xdiff/xmerge.c b/xdiff/xmerge.c
>> index ac0cf52f3be..676ad39020d 100644
>> --- a/xdiff/xmerge.c
>> +++ b/xdiff/xmerge.c
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int xdl_append_merge(xdmerge_t **merge, int mode,
>> m->chg1 = i1 + chg1 - m->i1;
>> m->chg2 = i2 + chg2 - m->i2;
>> } else {
>> - m = xdl_malloc(sizeof(xdmerge_t));
>> + m = malloc(sizeof(xdmerge_t));
>> if (!m)
>> return -1;
>> m->next = NULL;
>> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static int xdl_refine_conflicts(xdfenv_t *xe1, xdfenv_t *xe2, xdmerge_t *m,
>> m->i2 = xscr->i2 + i2;
>> m->chg2 = xscr->chg2;
>> while (xscr->next) {
>> - xdmerge_t *m2 = xdl_malloc(sizeof(xdmerge_t));
>> + xdmerge_t *m2 = malloc(sizeof(xdmerge_t));
>> if (!m2) {
>> xdl_free_env(&xe);
>> xdl_free_script(x);
>> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static int xdl_do_merge(xdfenv_t *xe1, xdchange_t *xscr1,
>> ancestor_name,
>> favor, changes, NULL, style,
>> marker_size);
>> - result->ptr = xdl_malloc(size);
>> + result->ptr = malloc(size);
>> if (!result->ptr) {
>> xdl_cleanup_merge(changes);
>> return -1;
>> @@ -718,14 +718,14 @@ int xdl_merge(mmfile_t *orig, mmfile_t *mf1, mmfile_t *mf2,
>> }
>> status = 0;
>> if (!xscr1) {
>> - result->ptr = xdl_malloc(mf2->size);
>> + result->ptr = malloc(mf2->size);
>> if (!result->ptr)
>> goto out;
>> status = 0;
>> memcpy(result->ptr, mf2->ptr, mf2->size);
>> result->size = mf2->size;
>> } else if (!xscr2) {
>> - result->ptr = xdl_malloc(mf1->size);
>> + result->ptr = malloc(mf1->size);
>> if (!result->ptr)
>> goto out;
>> status = 0;
>> diff --git a/xdiff/xutils.c b/xdiff/xutils.c
>> index c0cd5338c4e..865e08f0e93 100644
>> --- a/xdiff/xutils.c
>> +++ b/xdiff/xutils.c
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void *xdl_cha_alloc(chastore_t *cha) {
>> void *data;
>> if (!(ancur = cha->ancur) || ancur->icurr == cha->nsize) {
>> - if (!(ancur = (chanode_t *) xdl_malloc(sizeof(chanode_t) + cha->nsize))) {
>> + if (!(ancur = (chanode_t *) malloc(sizeof(chanode_t) + cha->nsize))) {
>> return NULL;
>> }