Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] receive-pack: Clean dead code from update_worktree()
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 10, 2021, 03:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <211110.86y25wirtj.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20211109230941.2518143-2-andersk@mit.edu>
On Tue, Nov 09 2021, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> + if (!worktree || !worktree->path)
> + BUG("worktree->path must be non-NULL");Perhaps a metter of taste, but I think BUG() should really be used for things that need a custom message over and beyond what assert() gives us.
In this case using BUG() gives you a worse message, if you do:
assert(worktree && worktree->path)
You'll get a sensible message from any modern compiler quotign the variable etc, all of which says the same thing as that BUG() message, just with less verbosity.