Re: [PATCH] object-file: don't use object database without a repository
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 5, 2026, 06:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20260405064651.GA1452907@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20260404172817.2995133-1-luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 07:28:17PM +0200, Luca Stefani wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> When running `git diff -- $file1 $file2' on large enough files, > index_fd() attempts to use 'the_repository->objects', assuming it > is initialized, but that's not the case for non-repository usecases. > > When git diff is invoked without a backing repository, > INDEX_WRITE_OBJECT is never set in flags, meaning only the hash is > needed and nothing should be written to the object store. > > Enforce the use of index_core() in this case.
I don't think we want to use index_core() for a large file, though. A test like this:
diff --git a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh index 15076dfe0d..7ef5604430 100755 --- a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh +++ b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh @@ -413,4 +413,10 @@ test_expect_success 'diff --no-index with pathspec glob and exclude' ' test_cmp expect actual ' +test_expect_success 'diff --no-index on a huge file' ' + dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=4000 >big.file && + echo whatever >small.file && + test_expect_code 1 git diff --no-index big.file small.file +' + test_done will now fail on a 32-bit system, because we try to mmap the whole file, which will fail. We really do want to follow the streaming code path (which knows to respect the lack of a WRITE_OBJECT flag and works without an odb in that case). It's kind of an expensive test, though, so we probably don't want to actually include it in the test suite. -Peff PS I'd expect a 4GB+ file to work, too, but it looks like the diff code barfs when trying to stuff the file into a diff_filespec. A simpler example is: dd if=/dev/zero bs=1G count=5 >big.file git hash-object big.file but that dies, too! It looks like the streaming helper uses a size_t to take the size, which is wrong. It really should be an off_t. So I dunno, maybe nobody cares about ever working with 4GB files on 32-bit systems these days. It still feels like we should avoid a large mmap, though.