Re: [PATCH] object-file: don't use object database without a repository

> On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 07:28:17PM +0200, Luca Stefani wrote:
>
>> When running `git diff -- $file1 $file2' on large enough files,
>> index_fd() attempts to use 'the_repository->objects', assuming it
>> is initialized, but that's not the case for non-repository usecases.
>>
>> When git diff is invoked without a backing repository,
>> INDEX_WRITE_OBJECT is never set in flags, meaning only the hash is
>> needed and nothing should be written to the object store.
>>
>> Enforce the use of index_core() in this case.
> I don't think we want to use index_core() for a large file, though. A
> test like this:

> diff --git a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> index 15076dfe0d..7ef5604430 100755
> --- a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> +++ b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> @@ -413,4 +413,10 @@ test_expect_success 'diff --no-index with pathspec glob and exclude' '
>   	test_cmp expect actual
>   '
>   
> +test_expect_success 'diff --no-index on a huge file' '
> +	dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=4000 >big.file &&
> +	echo whatever >small.file &&
> +	test_expect_code 1 git diff --no-index big.file small.file
> +'
> +
>   test_done

>
> will now fail on a 32-bit system, because we try to mmap the whole file,
> which will fail.  We really do want to follow the streaming code path
> (which knows to respect the lack of a WRITE_OBJECT flag and works
> without an odb in that case).
>
> It's kind of an expensive test, though, so we probably don't want to
> actually include it in the test suite.
>
> -Peff
>
> PS I'd expect a 4GB+ file to work, too, but it looks like the diff code
>     barfs when trying to stuff the file into a diff_filespec. A simpler
>     example is:
>
>       dd if=/dev/zero bs=1G count=5 >big.file
>       git hash-object big.file
>
>     but that dies, too! It looks like the streaming helper uses a size_t
>     to take the size, which is wrong. It really should be an off_t. So I
>     dunno, maybe nobody cares about ever working with 4GB files on 32-bit
>     systems these days. It still feels like we should avoid a large mmap,
>     though.