git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v4 3/7] parse-options: support unit factors in `OPT_INTEGER()`

From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Date
Apr 17, 2025, 10:49 UTC
Message-ID
<20250417-b4-pks-parse-options-integers-v4-3-9cbc76b61cfe@pks.im>
In-Reply-To
<20250417-b4-pks-parse-options-integers-v4-0-9cbc76b61cfe@pks.im>

There are two main differences between `OPT_INTEGER()` and `OPT_MAGNITUDE()`:

  - The former parses signed integers whereas the latter parses unsigned
    integers.
  - The latter parses unit factors like 'k', 'm' or 'g'.

While the first difference makes obvious sense, there isn't really a good reason why signed integers shouldn't support unit factors, too.

This inconsistency will also become a bit of a problem with subsequent commits, where we will fix a couple of callsites that pass an unsigned integer to `OPT_INTEGER()`. There are three options:

  - We could adapt those users to instead pass a signed integer, but
    this would needlessly extend the range of accepted integer values.
  - We could convert them to use `OPT_MAGNITUDE()`, as it only accepts
    unsigned integers. But now we have the inconsistency that we also
    start to accept unit factors.
  - We could introduce `OPT_UNSIGNED()` as equivalent to `OPT_INTEGER()`
    so that it knows to only accept unsigned integers without unit
    suffix.

Introducing a whole new option type feels a bit excessive. There also isn't really a good reason why `OPT_INTEGER()` cannot be extended to also accept unit factors: all valid values passed to such options cannot have a unit factors right now, so there wouldn't be any ambiguity.

Refactor `OPT_INTEGER()` to use `git_parse_int()`, which knows to interpret unit factors. This removes the inconsistency between the signed and unsigned options so that we can easily fix up callsites that pass the wrong integer type right now.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
---
 Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.adoc | 6 ++++--
 parse-options.c                                | 8 ++++----
 t/t0040-parse-options.sh                       | 4 +++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.adoc b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.adoc
index 61fa6ee1678..63acfb419bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.adoc
+++ b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.adoc
@@ -211,8 +211,10 @@ There are some macros to easily define options:
 	Use of `--no-option` will clear the list of preceding values.
 
 `OPT_INTEGER(short, long, &int_var, description)`::
-	Introduce an option with integer argument.
-	The integer is put into `int_var`.
+	Introduce an option with integer argument. The argument must be a
+	integer and may include a suffix of 'k', 'm' or 'g' to
+	scale the provided value by 1024, 1024^2 or 1024^3 respectively.
+	The scaled value is put into `int_var`.
 
 `OPT_MAGNITUDE(short, long, &unsigned_long_var, description)`::
 	Introduce an option with a size argument. The argument must be a
diff --git a/parse-options.c b/parse-options.c
index 35fbb3b0d63..b287436e81a 100644
--- a/parse-options.c
+++ b/parse-options.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static enum parse_opt_result do_get_value(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *p,
 					  enum opt_parsed flags,
 					  const char **argp)
 {
-	const char *s, *arg;
+	const char *arg;
 	const int unset = flags & OPT_UNSET;
 	int err;
 
@@ -185,9 +185,9 @@ static enum parse_opt_result do_get_value(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *p,
 		if (!*arg)
 			return error(_("%s expects a numerical value"),
 				     optname(opt, flags));
-		*(int *)opt->value = strtol(arg, (char **)&s, 10);
-		if (*s)
-			return error(_("%s expects a numerical value"),
+		if (!git_parse_int(arg, opt->value))
+			return error(_("%s expects an integer value"
+				       " with an optional k/m/g suffix"),
 				     optname(opt, flags));
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/t/t0040-parse-options.sh b/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
index 2fe3522305f..0c538c4b437 100755
--- a/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
+++ b/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
@@ -111,7 +111,9 @@ test_expect_success 'OPT_BOOL() no negation #2' 'check_unknown_i18n --no-no-fear
 
 test_expect_success 'OPT_BOOL() positivation' 'check boolean: 0 -D --doubt'
 
-test_expect_success 'OPT_INT() negative' 'check integer: -2345 -i -2345'
+test_expect_success 'OPT_INTEGER() negative' 'check integer: -2345 -i -2345'
+test_expect_success 'OPT_INTEGER() kilo' 'check integer: 239616 -i 234k'
+test_expect_success 'OPT_INTEGER() negative kilo' 'check integer: -239616 -i -234k'
 
 test_expect_success 'OPT_MAGNITUDE() simple' '
 	check magnitude: 2345678 -m 2345678
-- 
2.49.0.805.g082f7c87e0.dirty
Previous: Patrick SteinhardtNext: Patrick Steinhardt
Message 4 of 9 in “parse-options: harden handling of integer values”
  1. 0/7 parse-options: harden handling of integer valuesPatrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  2. 1/7 parse: fix off-by-one for minimum signed valuesPatrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  3. 2/7 global: use designated initializers for optionsPatrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  4. 3/7 parse-options: support unit factors in `OPT_INTEGER()`Patrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  5. 4/7 parse-options: rename `OPT_MAGNITUDE()` to `OPT_UNSIGNED()`Patrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  6. Junio C HamanoApr 17, 2025
  7. 5/7 parse-options: introduce precision handling for `OPTION_INTEGER`Patrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  8. 6/7 parse-options: introduce precision handling for `OPTION_UNSIGNED`Patrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025
  9. 7/7 parse-options: detect mismatches in integer signednessPatrick Steinhardt, Apr 17, 2025

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.