Re: [PATCH 3/3] t/chainlint: add tests for test body in heredoc

> This one made me think of an additional pathological case, though I'm
> not sure it's worth having a test:
> 
>     test_expect_success 'pathological-here-doc-body' - <<\EOF
>         echo "missing chain before"
>         cat >file <<-\EOF &&
>         inside inner here-doc
>         these are not shell commands
>         EOF
>         echo "missing chain after"
>         echo "but this line is OK because it's the end"
>    EOF
> 
> It's exactly the same as your test except that the same tag ("EOF") is
> used for both outer and inner heredocs. It works because the outer
> heredoc is introduced with `<<` whereas the inner with `<<-`. The
> opposite case, in which outer is introduced with `<<-` and inner with
> `<<`, obviously would be bogus.