git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git clone of empty repositories doesn't preserve hash

From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date
Apr 26, 2023, 10:51 UTC
Message-ID
<20230426105134.GA130148@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqcz3ry2sw.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:12:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> And I think even with "--no-local" to make it about v0/v1 protocol,
> the outcome is still pretty much expected.  If we make the above
> command line to
> 
> 	GIT_TRACE_PACKET=1 \
> 	git clone --no-local src256 dst256 &&
> 
> to clone over the on-the-wire protocol, then we see
> 
>     Cloning into 'dst256'...
>     packet:  upload-pack> 0000
>     packet:        clone< 0000
>     warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository.
>     packet:        clone> 0000
>     packet:  upload-pack< 0000
>     --- expect      2023-04-25 22:55:39.771850195 +0000
>     ...
> 
> in the output of "sh t5700-*.sh -i -v".  Without any ref, v0/v1 can
> not carry any capabilities, because there is no ref information to
> tuck the capabilities on.
> 
> I unfortunately doubt that any solution would exist that does not
> break compatibility with the deployed clients that expect the
> current v0/v1.

We could send a capabilities^{} line, which Git has supported on the client side since eb398797cd (connect: advertized capability is not a ref, 2016-09-09). So sending it should not break even old clients (though we would have to check what alternate implementations like libgit2 or dulwich do; we know JGit supports it).

However, the object-format support here was broken until the very recent 13e67aa39b (v0 protocol: fix sha1/sha256 confusion for capabilities^{}, 2023-04-14), so it would only be useful going forward (before then we'd die(), but maybe that is preferable to having the wrong object format?).

I'm not sure it's worth the effort, though. If you want to use sha256 everywhere and tell the other side about it, you need a modern client anyway, and that means the ability to speak v2. So this would only matter if for some reason the v2 probe was being ignored (e.g., proxies eating it, ssh refusing environment variable, etc), which itself are things that ideally would be fixed (and can maybe one day even go away if we optimistically default to v2).

-Peff
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 19 of 58 in “git clone of empty repositories doesn't preserve hash”
  1. Adam MajerApr 5, 2023
  2. Junio C HamanoApr 5, 2023
  3. Adam MajerApr 5, 2023
  4. Jeff KingApr 5, 2023
  5. Junio C HamanoApr 5, 2023
  6. Junio C HamanoApr 5, 2023
  7. Jeff KingApr 5, 2023
  8. brian m. carlsonApr 5, 2023
  9. Adam MajerApr 6, 2023
  10. brian m. carlsonApr 25, 2023
  11. Junio C HamanoApr 25, 2023
  12. Junio C HamanoApr 25, 2023
  13. brian m. carlsonApr 26, 2023
  14. Jeff KingApr 26, 2023
  15. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2023
  16. doc: GIT_DEFAULT_HASH is and will be ignored during "clone"Junio C Hamano, Apr 26, 2023
  17. brian m. carlsonApr 26, 2023
  18. Jeff KingApr 27, 2023
  19. Jeff KingApr 26, 2023
  20. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2023
  21. brian m. carlsonApr 26, 2023
  22. 0/2 Fix empty SHA-256 clones with v0 and v1brian m. carlson, Apr 26, 2023
  23. 1/2 http: advertise capabilities when cloning empty reposbrian m. carlson, Apr 26, 2023
  24. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2023
  25. brian m. carlsonApr 26, 2023
  26. Jeff KingApr 27, 2023
  27. Jeff KingApr 27, 2023
  28. Junio C HamanoApr 27, 2023
  29. 2/2 Honor GIT_DEFAULT_HASH for empty clones without remote algobrian m. carlson, Apr 26, 2023
  30. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2023
  31. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2023
  32. Jeff KingApr 27, 2023
  33. Is GIT_DEFAULT_HASH flawed?Felipe Contreras, May 2, 2023
  34. Adam MajerMay 3, 2023
  35. Felipe ContrerasMay 3, 2023
  36. Adam MajerMay 3, 2023
  37. Felipe ContrerasMay 8, 2023
  38. demerphqMay 3, 2023
  39. Felipe ContrerasMay 3, 2023
  40. brian m. carlsonMay 3, 2023
  41. Felipe ContrerasMay 8, 2023
  42. brian m. carlsonMay 8, 2023
  43. Oswald BuddenhagenMay 9, 2023
  44. Junio C HamanoMay 9, 2023
  45. Junio C HamanoApr 26, 2023
  46. Jeff KingApr 27, 2023
  47. 0/1 Fix empty SHA-256 clones with v0 and v1brian m. carlson, May 1, 2023
  48. 1/1 upload-pack: advertise capabilities when cloning empty reposbrian m. carlson, May 1, 2023
  49. Jeff KingMay 1, 2023
  50. Junio C HamanoMay 1, 2023
  51. Junio C HamanoMay 1, 2023
  52. 0/1 Fix empty SHA-256 clones with v0 and v1brian m. carlson, May 17, 2023
  53. 1/1 upload-pack: advertise capabilities when cloning empty reposbrian m. carlson, May 17, 2023
  54. Junio C HamanoMay 17, 2023
  55. brian m. carlsonMay 17, 2023
  56. Jeff KingMay 18, 2023
  57. brian m. carlsonMay 19, 2023
  58. Jeff KingApr 5, 2023

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.