Re: [PATCH 00/19] tests: fix broken &&-chains & abort loops on error

>On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 02:17:32PM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
>> > I have to admit to starting to skim once I got to the last four
>> > patches, since they were a bit longer and all the same type of change.
>>
>> Understandable. Those bulk-change patches tend to be mind-numbing to
>> review, though `git diff --color-words` helps out somewhat (at least
>> by making it easier to skim the changes).
>
>I likewise think I may have phased in and out of consciousness on those
>last four.
>
>> > You did an excellent job of explaining the changes and presented them
>> > in a logical fashion.  The few things I thought I caught, you've
>> > already answered were already correct.  I do think making the second
>> > commit message be a bit clearer about the importance of the ordering
>> > would be helpful.  Anyway:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks. I'll wait a couple days and resend with a clarified commit
>> message for the second patch unless, perhaps, Junio would accept a
>> resend of just that patch so I don't have to spam the list again.
>
>These looked good to me. I left a few comments, but nothing that I think
>would trigger a re-roll.
>