git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: document which output goes to stdout vs. stderr

From
Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
Date
Dec 1, 2021, 08:33 UTC
Message-ID
<20211201083301.ozrhi2brjk4zx5ll@fs>
In-Reply-To
<20211201053214.2902-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com>
On 01.12.2021 00:32, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 48 quoted lines
>It has long been practice in this project for a command to emit its
>primary output to stdout so that it can be captured to a file or sent
>down a pipe, and to emit "chatty" messages (such as those reporting
>progress) to stderr so that they don't interfere with the primary
>output. However, this idiomatic Unix practice is not necessarily
>universally understood and may be at odds with other schools of thought,
>such as the somewhat common one that only error messages should go to
>stderr, and all other messages to stdout. Let's help newcomers by
>documenting how stdout and stderr are used on this project.
>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
>---
> Documentation/CodingGuidelines | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
>index 711cb9171e..44dd178dc9 100644
>--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
>+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
>@@ -499,6 +499,32 @@ For Python scripts:
>  - Where required libraries do not restrict us to Python 2, we try to
>    also be compatible with Python 3.1 and later.
>
>+
>+Program Output
>+
>+ We make a distinction between a command's primary output and output
>+ which is merely chatty feedback (for instance, status messages,
>+ running transcript, or progress display), as well as error messages.
>+ Roughly speaking, a command's primary output is that which one might
>+ want to capture to a file or send down a pipe; its chatty output
>+ should not interfere with those use-cases.
>+
>+ As such, primary output should be sent to the standard output stream
>+ (stdout), and chatty output should be sent to the standard error
>+ stream (stderr). Examples of commands which produce primary output
>+ include `git log`, `git show`, and `git branch --list` which generate
>+ output on the stdout stream.
>+
>+ Not all commands have primary output; this is often true of commands
>+ whose main function is to perform an action. Some action commands are
>+ silent, whereas others are chatty. An example of a chatty action
>+ commands is `git clone` with its "Cloning into '<path>'..." and
>+ "Checking connectivity..." status messages which it sends to the
>+ stderr stream.
>+
>+ Error messages are always sent to the stderr stream.
>+

This is not necessarily true in the context of the tests. We just spoke about this in: https://lore.kernel.org/git/211130.86wnkpd6ou.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/T/#u

I don't think it necessary to bloat this explanation with the test details. But mentioning it as an exception would be good.

Previous: Eric SunshineNext: Eric Sunshine
Message 2 of 12 in “CodingGuidelines: document which output goes to stdout vs. stderr”
  1. CodingGuidelines: document which output goes to stdout vs. stderrEric Sunshine, Dec 1, 2021
  2. Fabian StelzerDec 1, 2021
  3. Eric SunshineDec 1, 2021
  4. Fabian StelzerDec 1, 2021
  5. Junio C HamanoDec 1, 2021
  6. Eric SunshineDec 1, 2021
  7. Jeff KingDec 1, 2021
  8. Eric SunshineDec 1, 2021
  9. Philip OakleyDec 1, 2021
  10. Eric SunshineDec 1, 2021
  11. CodingGuidelines: document which output goes to stdout vs. stderrEric Sunshine, Dec 2, 2021
  12. Jeff KingDec 2, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.