Re: [PATCH] init: don't reset core.filemode on git-new-workdirs.
- From
- Madhu <enometh@meer.net>
- Date
- Mar 22, 2021, 09:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20210322.143437.212295420302618690.enometh@meer.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq7dlz94by.fsf@gitster.g>
* Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> <xmqq7dlz94by.fsf@gitster.g> Wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2021 21:53:37 -0700
Show 24 quoted lines
> There are two points we should consider. > > * Historically, we've used .git/config as the sample file to check, > but that was not because we wanted to make sure we can chmod the > config file, but because we knew the file has to be there. If > .git/config is sometimes a symbolic link, and if chmod test > requires a regular file, we do not have to use .git/config as the > sample file. We could instead switch to use a different, > temporary, file. After all, the symlink check I pointed out in > the message you are responding to uses a brand new temporary > filename for that, and there is no reason why we shouldn't do the > same with a regular file for the filemode test. > > * If running "git init" in an already functioning repository can be > a useful way to "re-initialize" and/or "correct" various aspect > of the repository (e.g. perhaps core.filemode is incorrectly set > originally and running "git init" again corrects it), we would > want to allow that in a normal repository as well as in a > repository that is created by new-workdir the same way. Or if it > is not useful and we want "re-initialize" not to touch the > filemode, we would want to skip the check in a normal repository > as well as in a new-workdir repository the same way. That is why > "if symlink, then skip" is wrong---it targets the new-workdir > case specifically.
I'd say it doesn't (target the new-workdir case specifically). The lstat test on `config' is incorrect if `config' (or a new file) is not a regular file, so I think it should be fixed anyway. The new-workdir case happens to be handled correctly once this is fixed.
Show 7 quoted lines
> I personally do not have a strong opinion either way, but to me, it > seems that "does the filesystem support filemode?" and "does the > filesystem support symbolic link?" are at about the same level and > should be treated similarly unless there is a good reason not to. > And the symlink check is never done in "reinit" case, so perhaps > when "git init" is run again in an already functioning repository, > we should not muck with the filemode, either.
I'd think so (on the last point). While it is understandable to expect consistent re-initing behaviour (which is why the spurious git-init was there) the expectations may not hold if the git directory and work tree are on different filesystems - there is more scope for making wrong inferences.
Typically checkout worktrees with new-workdir in /dev/shm for advantages in the low overhead.
I do have repositories where .git/config is a symlink to a config.A and I have other config.B files - all for the same repo but with different upstreams. (I know better ways to do it but why should I be prevented from doing this)
Show 13 quoted lines
> A natural conclusion of the line of thought is that we can move the > "check filemode trustability" block (from the comment to concluding > git_config_set()) inside the "if (!reinit)" that happens a bit later > and we'd be fine---as an existing normal repository, as well as what > new-workdir creates, won't have to do the "let's chmod +x/-x the > config file and see what happens" code at all (perhaps the attached > patch, which hasn't even been compile tested). > > On the other hand, if it is worth "fixing" the filemode setting > while re-initializing, we probably should switch to use a temporary > file instead of 'config'. And we may want to reconsider the placement > of the "is symlink supported?" check---which may also have to be > redone to "fix" its existing value.
I don't think the posted patch (snipped) would work as reinit is always 1 and we are always a candidate for reiniting - I may be missing something.
Using a new file for the filemode test would be a natural improvement. But I dont see the added complexity as a win. I can imagine other scenarios that need to be fixed: calling git-init on a worktree prepared by git-new-worktree (not git-new-workdir) on a FAT fs with .git on ext2. Calling git-init on a worktree prepared by calling git-new-worktree with a parent which is checked out by git-new-workdir. (The parent has a symlinked config). The possibilities for fun endless :)