Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] SHA-256: Update commit-graph and multi-pack-index formats
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- Aug 17, 2020, 23:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200817231215.GT8085@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.703.v2.git.1597673089.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On 2020-08-17 at 14:04:45, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> As discussed [1], there is some concern around binary file formats requiring > the context of the repository config in order to infer hash lengths. Two > formats that were designed with the hash transition in mind (commit-graph > and multi-pack-index) have bytes available to indicate the hash algorithm > used. Let's actually update these formats to be more self-contained with the > two hash algorithms being available. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAN0heSp024=Kyy7gdQ2VSetk_5iVhj_qdT8CMVPcry_AwWrhHQ@mail.gmail.com/ > > This merges cleanly with tb/bloom-improvements, but both that branch and > this patch series have merge conflicts with the corrected commit date patch > series [2]. > > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.676.v2.git.1596941624.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
This series looked sane to me. Thanks for the patches, and feel free to have my
Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
-- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US