Re: Avoiding 'master' nomenclature
- From
- Oleg <lego_12239@rambler.ru>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2020, 08:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200731081925.GA5533@legohost>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200731005721.GC240563@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:57:21PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:17:43AM +0300, lego_12239@rambler.ru wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > > The commit message describes its intent > > > commit 489947cee5095b168cbac111ff7bd1eadbbd90dd > > > Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> > > > Date: Tue Jun 23 22:33:23 2020 +0000 > > > > > > fmt-merge-msg: stop treating `master` specially > > > > > > In the context of many projects renaming their primary branch names away > > > from `master`, Git wants to stop treating the `master` branch specially. > > > > Wow. Jonathan, you are a good student of Goebbels! "many projects" :-D. > > You lie. These are few but very noisy projects. Don't kid youself. > > - the text you are responding to isn't even Jonathan's; it was a > quoted commit message to give context.
Yes. It's my mistake. Sorry.
> - if you really do want re-open the argument about whether projects > are interested in changing branch names, it might help to provide > some actual data. Most of the data-less points (on both sides) have > already been made in past discussions.
Most of the actual data have already been made, but polytics won out over common sense.
-- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)