Re: Avoiding 'master' nomenclature
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2020, 00:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200730003107.GC2996059@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200730001442.GA2996059@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:14:42PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I think this will be matching branch names, not fully qualified refs. > Seems reasonable, but we should be sure to document that.
Also, I guess it would see "HEAD" when we're on a detached HEAD. That's slightly ambiguous to match, in that you _could_ have refs/heads/HEAD, but we try to make that hard to do. So it's probably not worth worrying about.
-Peff