Re: Consensus on a new default branch name
- From
- Oleg <lego_12239@rambler.ru>
- Date
- Jun 16, 2020, 19:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200616190044.GB27441@legohost>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200616134449.1c27cf7c@mydesk.domain.cxm>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 01:44:49PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> Makes perfect sense to me. No reasonable person can argue against > giving individual repository owners the ability to *easily* call their > "primary" branch anything they want.
This is great. But
Show 6 quoted lines
> This flame war plus the publicity it generated lets everybody know that > someday, whether in 1 month or 5 years, the default will be something > other than "master", so they'll start changing their software and > scripts to accommodate a variable instead of a hardcode, so when the > change happens, there will be minimal software disruption and minimal > hurt feelings.
this is not. Damn. Did you see what people say here? Why are you even forcing people to do this? Just stay "master" as a default and everyone will be happy.
-- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)