Re: Consensus on a new default branch name
- From
Santiago Torres Arias <santiago@nyu.edu>
- Date
- Jun 15, 2020, 21:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200615211055.7fggbfnjk2mawb6h@LykOS.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200615205722.GG71506@syl.local>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:57:22PM -0600, Taylor Blau wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Hello, > > Over the past few days or so, there has been significant discussion [1] and > patches [2] about changing the name of the default branch away from 'master' and > towards something else.
I've been refraining myself from commenting (specially with so many passionate voices on [1]), but I'm happy that this is happening. While I personally don't see anything offensive in 'master', I think it's worthwhile to try to accomodate more people in the community. As always, it's harder to identify what is bothering a particular group if you are not part of that group. Kudos to the community (and to you Taylor) for trying to move this topic forward in a constructive fashion.
> My interpretation thus far is that 'main' is the planned replacement for > 'master'. Consensus seems to have formed around this name [5], but if that's > incorrect--or there are yet-unvoiced opinions that you would like to share--now > is the time to discuss further.
I'm not familiar with how formal consensus is built in this community, but take this as an explicit +1 from me.
Cheers! -Santiago