Re: [PATCH] t/t0000-basic: make sure subtests also use TEST_SHELL_PATH
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 7, 2020, 11:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200507113935.GB3027470@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200507010746.83418-1-carenas@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:07:46PM -0700, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:
> 3f824e91c8 (t/Makefile: introduce TEST_SHELL_PATH, 2017-12-08) allows for > setting a shell for running the tests, but the generated subtests weren't > updated.
Yeah, this makes sense. The primary benefit of $TEST_SHELL_PATH was to get better support for special testing options (like using bash's trace_fd with "-x"). But based on recent patches I guess you were wanting to test the behavior of an unusual shell. And if we're testing how the test framework runs, certainly using TEST_SHELL_PATH is the most sensible thing.
-Peff