Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vreportf(): avoid relying on stdio buffering
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2019, 06:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20191031062454.GB20830@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910300947410.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:54:52AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > One non-bikeshed question: would fprintf() on some platforms have sent > > "\r\n", which is no longer happening with our write()? Do we need to > > care about that? > > I am not aware of any platform where `fprintf()` would automatically > transform `\n` to `\r\n`. Not unless the `FILE *` in question has been > opened with the `t` flag. And I am rather certain that `stderr` is not > opened with that flag. And if it was, I would force it off in Git for > Windows.
OK, thanks. You guessed the platform I was thinking of. :)
Another more far-fetched one: IIRC our stdio wrappers on Windows do some magic to convert ANSI color codes into actual terminal codes. Could that be a problem here? I think we'd kill off any color codes in the actual message due to the control-code replacement. In theory the prefix could have them. I don't think any code does now, but the PUSH_COLOR_ERROR stuff in builtin/push.c is getting close. I wouldn't be surprised for that to eventually get folded into error().
-Peff