Re: git cat-file --batch surprising carriage return behavior
- From
Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name>
- Date
- Oct 9, 2019, 15:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20191009152851.GC19679@kitenet.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20191008200050.GA26453@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> If we just add a new "-z", that's less disruptive_and_ easier to use.
Agreed.
> I suspect it's not entirely sufficient for clean input, though. You're
> not feeding filenames but rather full "object names". I wouldn't be
> surprised if we mis-parse "$rev:$path" when $path has "@{}" or similar
> in it.Nothing I've tried along the lines of "HEAD:{yesterday}" has misparsed the part after the colon as anything but a filename.
The one I can think of where there's a parse ambiguity is that while :foo gets file foo, :1:foo does not get file "1:foo". Instead it's treated as a stage number. Using either HEAD:1:foo or :./1:foo will avoid that ambiguity.
-- see shy jo