From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:28:51 GMT Subject: Re: git cat-file --batch surprising carriage return behavior Message-ID: <20191009152851.GC19679@kitenet.net> In-Reply-To: <20191008200050.GA26453@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King wrote: > If we just add a new "-z", that's less disruptive_and_ easier to use. Agreed. > I suspect it's not entirely sufficient for clean input, though. You're > not feeding filenames but rather full "object names". I wouldn't be > surprised if we mis-parse "$rev:$path" when $path has "@{}" or similar > in it. Nothing I've tried along the lines of "HEAD:{yesterday}" has misparsed the part after the colon as anything but a filename. The one I can think of where there's a parse ambiguity is that while :foo gets file foo, :1:foo does not get file "1:foo". Instead it's treated as a stage number. Using either HEAD:1:foo or :./1:foo will avoid that ambiguity. -- see shy jo