Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] trace2: correct trace2 field name documentation
- From
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
- Date
- Jun 12, 2019, 18:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190612181426.GB42943@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqwohqiszh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 2019.06.12 11:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes: > > > Correct the api-trace2 documentation, which lists "signal" as an > > expected field for the signal event type, but which actually outputs > > "signo" as the field name. > > > Nice. Is this one of the findings made by your validation, by the way?
Yes. I based both versions of the schema purely off the documentation, then tested against real output. This was the only discrepancy that was uncovered.