From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 18:14:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] trace2: correct trace2 field name documentation
Message-ID: <20190612181426.GB42943@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwohqiszh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 2019.06.12 11:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
> 
> > Correct the api-trace2 documentation, which lists "signal" as an
> > expected field for the signal event type, but which actually outputs
> > "signo" as the field name.
> 
> 
> Nice.  Is this one of the findings made by your validation, by the way?

Yes. I based both versions of the schema purely off the documentation, then
tested against real output. This was the only discrepancy that was uncovered.