Re: [PATCH] doc: explain why file: URLs and bundles don't mix
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 14, 2019, 09:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190514092900.GA11679@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqv9yebwzp.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 05:05:14PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I think what is closer to the reaility is that we check if the > source is a bundle when the local filesystem path is used and try to > clone from the bundle, before using the local filesystem path as a > directory we can "clone --local" from. On the other hand, when the > <scheme>://<path> syntax is used, we do not even bother seeing if > the named resource is a bundle, or if --local optimization is > possible (because we do not bother seeing if the named resource is a > local filesystem entity, either).
Yeah. My concern on reading Alyssa's patch is that it goes into too much detail about "why", when this is basically just "it's a bug that nobody has yet fixed". I think it makes sense to warn people about the behavior, but we should probably be vague about the reasons and up-front that there is really no good reason that it doesn't work (and it might in the future).
Of course fixing the issue is better still. ;)
Show 7 quoted lines
> A possibly interesting tangent to think about is what would happen > if we slightly tweak the above design. What it would require for > the code to take "git clone https://site/repo.bndl", realize that > the named resource is a bundle file, curl/wget it and clone from > that downloaded bundle? And if it is feasible to implement, would > it even be a good idea to begin with? I do not have a ready answer > to either of these questions myself.
I've been meaning to come back to this for, oh, going on 8 years now:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20111110074330.GA27925@sigill.intra.peff.net/
(though it was meant to work with a CDN "try this first then top-off" strategy; with Jonathan Tan's more flexible CDN work which uses raw packfiles, I doubt I'd come back to this).
-Peff