Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin/tag: do not omit -v gpg out for --format
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 9, 2019, 07:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20190509073644.GA24493@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190427202123.15380-2-santiago@nyu.edu>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:21:22PM -0400, santiago@nyu.edu wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> From: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu> > > The current implementation of git tag -v omits the gpg output when the > --format flag is passed. This may not be useful to users that want to > see the gpg output *and* --format the output of the git tag -v. Instead, > pass the default gpg interface output if --format is specified.
Yeah, I think this is the right thing to do.
Show 11 quoted lines
> @@ -110,10 +110,10 @@ static int verify_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
> {
> int flags;
> const struct ref_format *format = cb_data;
> - flags = GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE;
> + flags = 0;
>
> - if (format->format)
> - flags = GPG_VERIFY_OMIT_STATUS;
> + if (!format->format)
> + flags = GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE;So we're going to stop setting OMIT_STATUS ever, which makes sense.
It took me a minute to figure out here that the behavior for VERBOSE is not changed, because we _overwrite_ flags, rather than just setting a single bit. But that's definitely the right thing to do when there's a format (both before and after your patch).
So this looks good to me. I think we should probably cover it with a test in t7004.
-Peff