git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[RFC PATCH 5/5] split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split index

From
SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Date
Sep 6, 2018, 02:48 UTC
Message-ID
<20180906024810.8074-6-szeder.dev@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20180906024810.8074-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com>

Ever since the split index feature was introduced [1], refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git problem.

Consider the following sequence of commands updating the split index when the shared index contains a racily clean cache entry, i.e. an entry whose cached stat data matches with the corresponding file in the worktree and the cached mtime matches that of the index:

  echo "cached content" >file
  git update-index --split-index --add file
  echo "dirty worktree" >file    # size stays the same!
  # ... wait ...
  git update-index --add other-file

Normally, when a non-split index is updated, then do_write_index() (the function responsible for writing all kinds of indexes, "regular", split, and shared) recognizes racily clean cache entries, and writes them with smudged stat data, i.e. with file size set to 0. When subsequent git commands read the index, they will notice that the smudged stat data doesn't match with the file in the worktree, and then go on to check the file's content.

In the above example, however, in the second 'git update-index' prepare_to_write_split_index() gathers all cache entries that should be written to the new split index. Alas, this function never looks out for racily clean cache entries, and since the file's stat data in the worktree hasn't changed since the shared index was written, it won't be replaced in the new split index. Consequently, do_write_index() doesn't even get this racily clean cache entry, and can't smudge its stat data. Subsequent git commands will then see that the index has more recent mtime than the file and that the (not smudged) cached stat data still matches with the file in the worktree, and, ultimately, will erroneously consider the file clean.

Modify prepare_to_write_split_index() to recognize racily clean cache entries, and mark them to be added to the split index. This way do_write_index() will get these racily clean cache entries as well, and will then write them with smudged stat data to the new split index.

Note that after this change if the index is split when it contains a racily clean cache entry, then a smudged cache entry will be written both to the new shared and to the new split indexes. This doesn't affect regular git commands: as far as they are concerned this is just an entry in the split index replacing an outdated entry in the shared index. It did affect a few tests in 't1700-split-index.sh', though, because they actually check which entries are stored in the split index; the previous patch made the necessary adjustments. And racily clean cache entries and index splitting are rare enough to not worry about the resulting duplicated smudged cache entries, and the additional complexity required to prevent them is not worth it.

Several tests failed occasionally when the test suite was run with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes'. Here are those that I managed to trace back to this racy split index problem, starting with those failing more frequently, with a link to a failing Travis CI build job for each. The highlighted line shows when the racy file was written, which is not always in the failing test (but note that those lines are in the 'after failure' fold, and your browser might unhelpfully fold it up before you could take a good look).

  t3903-stash.sh:
    https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/385542084#L5858
  t4024-diff-optimize-common.sh:
    https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/386531969#L3174
  t4015-diff-whitespace.sh:
    https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/360797600#L8215
  t2200-add-update.sh:
    https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/382543426#L3051
  t0090-cache-tree:
    https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/416583010#L3679

There might be others, e.g. perhaps 't1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh' and others using 'lib-read-tree-m-3way.sh', but I couldn't confirm yet.

[1] In the branch leading to the merge commit v2.1.0-rc0~45 (Merge
    branch 'nd/split-index', 2014-07-16).
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
---
 cache.h                     |  2 ++
 read-cache.c                |  2 +-
 split-index.c               | 12 +++++++++++-
 t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh |  4 +---
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 4d014541ab..3f419b6c79 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ extern void *read_blob_data_from_index(const struct index_state *, const char *,
 #define CE_MATCH_REFRESH		0x10
 /* don't refresh_fsmonitor state or do stat comparison even if CE_FSMONITOR_VALID is true */
 #define CE_MATCH_IGNORE_FSMONITOR 0X20
+extern int is_racy_timestamp(const struct index_state *istate,
+			     const struct cache_entry *ce);
 extern int ie_match_stat(struct index_state *, const struct cache_entry *, struct stat *, unsigned int);
 extern int ie_modified(struct index_state *, const struct cache_entry *, struct stat *, unsigned int);
 
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index 7b1354d759..8f644f68b4 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
+++ b/read-cache.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int is_racy_stat(const struct index_state *istate,
 		);
 }
 
-static int is_racy_timestamp(const struct index_state *istate,
+int is_racy_timestamp(const struct index_state *istate,
 			     const struct cache_entry *ce)
 {
 	return (!S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode) &&
diff --git a/split-index.c b/split-index.c
index 84f067e10d..b4458f31f6 100644
--- a/split-index.c
+++ b/split-index.c
@@ -220,8 +220,18 @@ void prepare_to_write_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
 			}
 			ce->ce_flags |= CE_MATCHED; /* or "shared" */
 			base = si->base->cache[ce->index - 1];
-			if (ce == base)
+			if (ce == base) {
+				/*
+				 * Racily clean cache entries must be
+				 * written to the split index, so the
+				 * subsequent do_write_index() can smudge
+				 * their stat data.
+				 */
+				if (!ce_uptodate(ce) &&
+				    is_racy_timestamp(istate, ce))
+					ce->ce_flags |= CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE;
 				continue;
+			}
 			if (ce->ce_namelen != base->ce_namelen ||
 			    strcmp(ce->name, base->name)) {
 				ce->index = 0;
diff --git a/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh b/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh
index c92ba9ce5e..6780d08367 100755
--- a/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ done
 
 for trial in 0 1 2 3 4
 do
-	test_expect_failure "update the split index when the shared index contains a racily clean cache entry #$trial" '
+	test_expect_success "update the split index when the shared index contains a racily clean cache entry #$trial" '
 		test_when_finished "rm -f .git/index .git/sharedindex.*" &&
 
 		# The next three commands must be run within the same
@@ -100,8 +100,6 @@ do
 		# corresponding replacement cache entry with smudged
 		# stat data should be added to the new split index, so
 		# the file wont appear clean for subsequent git commands.
-		#
-		# Alas, such a smudged replacement entry is not added!
 		git update-index --add other-file &&
 
 		check_cached_diff
-- 
2.19.0.rc0.188.g56c5ee2db1
Previous: Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNext: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Message 12 of 20 in “Fix the racy split index problem”
  1. 0/5 Fix the racy split index problemSZEDER Gábor, Sep 6, 2018
  2. 1/5 t1700-split-index: drop unnecessary 'grep'SZEDER Gábor, Sep 6, 2018
  3. Junio C HamanoSep 6, 2018
  4. Duy NguyenSep 8, 2018
  5. 2/5 t0090: disable GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX for the test checking split indexSZEDER Gábor, Sep 6, 2018
  6. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  7. 3/5 split index: add a test to demonstrate the racy split index problemSZEDER Gábor, Sep 6, 2018
  8. 4/5 t1700-split-index: date back files to avoid racy situationsSZEDER Gábor, Sep 6, 2018
  9. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  10. SZEDER GáborSep 6, 2018
  11. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  12. 5/5 split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split indexSZEDER Gábor, Sep 6, 2018
  13. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  14. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  15. SZEDER GáborSep 6, 2018
  16. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  17. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonSep 6, 2018
  18. SZEDER GáborSep 7, 2018
  19. Paul-Sebastian UngureanuSep 10, 2018
  20. Duy NguyenSep 8, 2018

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.