Re: [PATCH 0/9] introducing oideq()
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- Aug 29, 2018, 00:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180829000806.GC432229@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180828212126.GA7039@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:21:27PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:56:21PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > > I would quite like to see this series picked up for v2.20. If we want > > to minimize performance regressions with the SHA-256 work, I think it's > > important. > > Thanks. One of the things I was worried about was causing unnecessary > conflicts with existing topics, including your work. But if everybody is > on board, I'd be happy to see this go in early in the next release cycle > (the longer we wait, the more annoying conflicts Junio has to resolve).
I can send out work that doesn't conflict with this while it makes its way to master. There are a lot of test fixes that can go in in the mean time.
I will be sending out a series that actually implements SHA-256 as an RFC soon, but I don't think there will be any conflicts (and it will just be an RFC anyway).
-- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204