Re: git-bug: Distributed bug tracker embedded in git

From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 19, 2018, 05:01 UTC
Message-ID: <20180819050147.GA207351@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <87y3d3m2e4.fsf@kyleam.com>

(+ git-dit authors) Kyle Meyer wrote:

> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

Show 15 quoted lines

>> I believe you're thinking of TicGit[1].
>>
>> Some other related work is listed at [2].  Most of these projects have
>> gone quiet:
>>
>> - ditz[3]
>> - git-issues[4]
>> - cil[5]
>> - Bugs Everywhere[6]
>> - milli by Steve Kemp, which I haven't found a copy of
>> - simple defects[7]
>> - kipling[8]
>
> To add to that list: There's also BuGit [1,2], though it too seems to
> have gone quiet.

I just found a good list on a non Git-specific wiki[3] that is more helpful (more up to date and has more discussion) than the list on the Git wiki.

It might be a good place to coordinate and compare notes. git-dit[4] in particular seems to have very similar goals and a similar data model. In my ideal world there may be a path forward that involves working more closely together.

Thanks, Jonathan

> [1]: https://gitlab.com/monnier/bugit
> [2]: https://public-inbox.org/git/jwva8psr6vr.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.version-control.git@gnu.org/

[3] https://dist-bugs.branchable.com/software/ [4] https://github.com/neithernut/git-dit