Re: git-bug: Distributed bug tracker embedded in git
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 18, 2018, 05:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180818054300.GB241538@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACSZ0Pwzs2e7E5RUEPDcEUsa=inzCyBAptU7YaCUw+5=MutSsA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Michael Muré wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I released today git-bug, a distributed bug tracker that embeds in > git. It use git's internal storage to store bugs information in a way > that can be merged without conflict. You can push/pull to the normal > git remote you are already using to interact with other people. Normal > code and bugs are completely separated and no files are added in the > regular branches.
I am a bit unhappy about the namespace grab. Not for trademark reasons: the Git trademark rules are pretty clear about this kind of usage being okay. Instead, the unhappiness comes because a future Git command like "git bug" to produce a bug report with appropriate diagnostics for a bug in Git seems like a likely and useful thing to get added to Git some day. And now the name's taken.
Is it too late to ask if it's possible to come up with a less generic name?
Separately from that, I'm happy to see progress being made in the distributed bug tracker world; thanks for that!
Thanks, Jonathan