Re: [PATCH 00/36] object_id part 12

From: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Date: Feb 22, 2018, 00:24 UTC
Message-ID: <20180222002408.GH6619@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh8qayybs.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:47:19AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
> 
> > This is the twelfth in a series of patches to convert from unsigned char
> > [20] to struct object_id.  This series is based on next.
> >
> > Included in this series are conversions for find_unique_abbrev and
> > lookup_replace_object, as well as parts of the sha1_file code.
> >
> > Conflicts with pu are average in number but minor, mostly because of the
> > type_name conversion.  None of them are tricky, except that the
> > introduction of get_tree_entry_if_blob requires a conversion of that
> > function.
> 
> And the reason why this is based on 'next' is...?  Which topic(s) do
> we have to wait for until we can queue this series, in other words?
> 
> Thanks for working on this, though.

It was waiting on the hash_algo changes I had submitted, and I don't believe they'd made it into master. When they have, I'll rebase and send a v2.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204