Re: [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: mention "static" and "extern"
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2018, 19:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180209193319.GB15554@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180209110738.edbc7a700b689db6967ec86a@google.com>
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:07:38AM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:14:06 -0500 > Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: mention "static" and "extern" > > > [...] > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > > > --- > > > diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines > > > @@ -386,6 +386,11 @@ For C programs: > > > + - Variables and functions local to a given source file should be marked > > > + with "static". Variables that are visible to other source files > > > + must be declared with "extern" in header files. However, function > > > + declarations should not use "extern", as that is already the default. > > > > Perhaps: > > > > ... as that is already the default, unless declarations in the > > header are already "extern", in which case consistency > > may favor mirroring existing usage. > > > > or something. > > I would prefer not mirroring existing usage in this case - I think it's > better if the code becomes eventually consistent in not using extern.
Agreed. I think individual bullets in CodingGuidelines should be definitive where possible, describing the end-game we strive for.
-Peff