Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] object_id part 10
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- Oct 12, 2017, 10:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20171012102220.zfrsg3hgtmiahwow@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqo9pcznza.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:58:49PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes: > > > In the course of that, I'll rebase on top of master so that Junio can > > avoid as much conflict resolution as possible. > > I actually do not mind either way, but by rebasing on top of a more > recent codebase you can lose a large part of 07/24 IIRC, which would > be a big plus ;-)
Yes, I just noticed that. The patch used to be bigger still, but as I mentioned in the original cover letter, a lot of it went away due to previous work in that area.
-- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204