Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] submodule: improve submodule_has_commits

> On 05/02, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> wrote:
> > > On 05/01, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> wrote:
> > >> > +
> > >> > +               if (capture_command(&cp, &out, GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1) || out.len)
> > >>
> > >> eh, I gave too much and self-contradicting feedback here earlier,
> > >> ideally I'd like to review this to be similar as:
> > >>
> > >>     if (capture_command(&cp, &out, GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1)
> > >>         die("cannot capture git-rev-list in submodule '%s', sub->path);
> > >
> > > This wouldn't really work because if you provide a SHA1 to rev-list
> > > which it isn't able to find then it returns a non-zero exit code which
> > > would cause this to die, which isn't the desired behavior.
> > 
> > Oh. In that case, why do we even check for its stdout?
> > (from rev-lists man page)
> >        --quiet
> >            Don’t print anything to standard output. This form is primarily
> >            meant to allow the caller to test the exit status to see if a range
> >            of objects is fully connected (or not). It is faster than
> >            redirecting stdout to /dev/null as the output does not have to be
> >            formatted.
> > 
> 
> Sounds good, Let me take a look at using --quiet

> 
> > >
> > > I feel like you're making this a little too complicated, as all I'm
> > > doing is shuffling around already existing logic.  I understand the want
> > > to make things more robust but this seems unnecessarily complex.
> > 
> > ok. I was just giving my thoughts on how I would approach it.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Stefan
> 
> -- 
> Brandon Williams