[PATCH] cache-tree: reject entries with null sha1
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 21, 2017, 18:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170421184617.lc5bioa5px6ninrj@sigill.intra.peff.net>
We generally disallow null sha1s from entering the index, due to 4337b5856 (do not write null sha1s to on-disk index, 2012-07-28). However, we loosened that in 83bd7437c (write_index: optionally allow broken null sha1s, 2013-08-27) so that tools like filter-branch could be used to repair broken history.
However, we should make sure that these broken entries do not get propagated into new trees. For most entries, we'd catch them with the missing-object check (since presumably the null sha1 does not exist in our object database). But gitlink entries do not need reachability, so we may blindly copy the entry into a bogus tree.
This patch rejects all null sha1s (with the same "invalid entry" message that missing objects get) when building trees from the index. It does so even for non-gitlinks, and even when "write-tree" is given the --missing-ok flag. The null sha1 is a special sentinel value that is already rejected in trees by fsck; whether the object exists or not, it is an error to put it in a tree.
Note that for this to work, we must also avoid reusing an existing cache-tree that contains the null sha1. This patch does so by just refusing to write out any cache tree when the index contains a null sha1. This is blunter than we need to be; we could just reject the subtree that contains the offending entry. But it's not worth the complexity. The behavior is unchanged unless you have a broken index entry, and even then we'd refuse the whole index write unless the emergency GIT_ALLOW_NULL_SHA1 is in use. And even then the end result is only a performance drop (any write-tree will have to generate the whole cache-tree from scratch).
The tests bear some explanation.
The existing test in t7009 doesn't catch this problem, because our index-filter runs "git rm --cached", which will try to rewrite the updated index and barf on the bogus entry. So we never even make it to write-tree. The new test there adds a noop index-filter, which does show the problem.
The new tests in t1601 are slightly redundant with what filter-branch is doing under the hood in t7009. But as they're much more direct, they're easier to reason about. And should filter-branch ever change or go away, we'd want to make sure that these plumbing commands behave sanely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> --- When merged to pu, this fixes the existing test breakage in t7009 when GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX is used (because the split index didn't rewrite the whole index, "git rm --cached" didn't always barf). But I think it's worth doing on its own merits, as demonstrated by the new tests.
The one thing I haven't figured out it is why the new test in t7009 fails with the split-index. And even more curiously, the new tests in t1601 _don't_ fail with it, even if I instrument the fake index to have more entries (making it more likely to split).
cache-tree.c | 4 +++- read-cache.c | 5 ++++- t/t1601-index-bogus.sh | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7009-filter-branch-null-sha1.sh | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t1601-index-bogus.sh
diff --git a/cache-tree.c b/cache-tree.c index 345ea3596..34baa6d85 100644 --- a/cache-tree.c +++ b/cache-tree.c @@ -354,7 +354,9 @@ static int update_one(struct cache_tree *it, entlen = pathlen - baselen; i++; } - if (mode != S_IFGITLINK && !missing_ok && !has_sha1_file(sha1)) { + + if (is_null_sha1(sha1) || + (mode != S_IFGITLINK && !missing_ok && !has_sha1_file(sha1))) { strbuf_release(&buffer); if (expected_missing) return -1; diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c index e44775182..6851de892 100644 --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -2054,6 +2054,7 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, int newfd, int entries = istate->cache_nr; struct stat st; struct strbuf previous_name_buf = STRBUF_INIT, *previous_name; + int drop_cache_tree = 0; for (i = removed = extended = 0; i < entries; i++) { if (cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_REMOVE) @@ -2104,6 +2105,8 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, int newfd, warning(msg, ce->name); else return error(msg, ce->name); + + drop_cache_tree = 1; } if (ce_write_entry(&c, newfd, ce, previous_name) < 0) return -1; @@ -2122,7 +2125,7 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, int newfd, if (err) return -1; } - if (!strip_extensions && istate->cache_tree) { + if (!strip_extensions && !drop_cache_tree && istate->cache_tree) { struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT; cache_tree_write(&sb, istate->cache_tree); diff --git a/t/t1601-index-bogus.sh b/t/t1601-index-bogus.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..73cc9323c --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t1601-index-bogus.sh @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='test handling of bogus index entries' +. ./test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success 'create tree with null sha1' ' + tree=$(printf "160000 commit $_z40\\tbroken\\n" | git mktree) +' + +test_expect_success 'read-tree refuses to read null sha1' ' + test_must_fail git read-tree $tree +' + +test_expect_success 'GIT_ALLOW_NULL_SHA1 overrides refusal' ' + GIT_ALLOW_NULL_SHA1=1 git read-tree $tree +' + +test_expect_success 'git write-tree refuses to write null sha1' ' + test_must_fail git write-tree +' + +test_done diff --git a/t/t7009-filter-branch-null-sha1.sh b/t/t7009-filter-branch-null-sha1.sh index c27f90f28..a8d9ec498 100755 --- a/t/t7009-filter-branch-null-sha1.sh +++ b/t/t7009-filter-branch-null-sha1.sh @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ test_expect_success 'setup: bring HEAD and index in sync' ' git commit -a -m "back to normal" ' +test_expect_success 'noop filter-branch complains' ' + test_must_fail git filter-branch \ + --force --prune-empty \ + --index-filter "true" +' + test_expect_success 'filter commands are still checked' ' test_must_fail git filter-branch \ --force --prune-empty \
-- 2.13.0.rc0.364.g36b4d8031