Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] recursive submodules: git-reset!
On 04/18, Stefan Beller wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> v2:
> * improved commit message to be proper English (Thanks, Philip!)
> * clarified why the patch 2 is so short (i.e. it doesn't matter if the submodule
> is initialized in the preparation repo, we care about the actual testing repo!
> Thanks, Brandon)
That was the only thing I was unsure about in v1. v2 lgtm.
Show 39 quoted lines
> * reworded patch 1 (Thanks Jonathan)
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
> v1: https://public-inbox.org/git/20170411234923.1860-1-sbeller@google.com/
>
> Now that the BIG one has landed, e394fa01d6 (Merge branch
> 'sb/checkout-recurse-submodules', 2017-03-28), you would expect that
> teaching to recurse into submodules is easy for all the remaining
> working tree manipulations?
>
> It turns out it is. See the last patch how we teach git-reset to recurse
> into submodules.
>
> However when thinking more about what git-reset is expected to do,
> I added tests and some fixes for them (patch 2+3).
>
> patch 1 is a correctness thing, required for patch 3.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
> Stefan Beller (4):
> entry.c: submodule recursing: respect force flag correctly
> submodule.c: uninitialized submodules are ignored in recursive
> commands
> submodule.c: submodule_move_head works with broken submodules
> builtin/reset: add --recurse-submodules switch
>
> builtin/reset.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> entry.c | 8 ++++----
> submodule.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> t/lib-submodule-update.sh | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> t/t7112-reset-submodule.sh | 8 ++++++++
> unpack-trees.c | 7 ++++++-
> 6 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>
--
Brandon Williams