Re: [BUG] branch renamed to 'HEAD'
- From
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2017, 09:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170227094738.mhv72nh4pp66vzny@macbook.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170227090233.uk7dfruggytgmuw2@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:33AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Ugh. Actually, there are a few complications I found: > > 1. Checking "HEAD" afterwards means you can't actually have a branch > named "HEAD". Doing so is probably insane, but we probably really > _do_ want to just disallow the @-conversion here. > > 2. This isn't limited to just HEAD and @-conversion. For instance:
It's a bit what I was afraid of.
Luc