From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:47:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG] branch renamed to 'HEAD'
Message-ID: <20170227094738.mhv72nh4pp66vzny@macbook.local>
In-Reply-To: <20170227090233.uk7dfruggytgmuw2@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:33AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> Ugh. Actually, there are a few complications I found:
> 
>   1. Checking "HEAD" afterwards means you can't actually have a branch
>      named "HEAD". Doing so is probably insane, but we probably really
>      _do_ want to just disallow the @-conversion here.
> 
>   2. This isn't limited to just HEAD and @-conversion. For instance:

It's a bit what I was afraid of.

Luc