Re: Bug: Incorrect stripping of the [PATCH] prefix in git-am
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2015, 00:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20151202005826.GE28197@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <5655DAE7.2000008@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:59:35PM +0100, huebbe wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Yes, it looks like the `--keep-non-patch` option works around this. > > However, shouldn't that be the default behaviour? > I mean, what is the point in stripping stuff that is not proven to be inserted by `git` itself? > That's not what I expect a tool to do which I trust.
The "[]" convention is a microformat used by Linux kernel folks. So it's not "whoops, we are stripping stuff not added by git". It is respecting a microformat used by the tool's authors.
That being said, if we were choosing a default from scratch today, it might go the other way. But we aren't, and we have to deal with the burden of breaking existing scripts by flipping it.
-Peff